Found the global warming cultist. The earth is cooling asshole. We're heading into a grand solar minimum. CO2 does not have a meaningful impact on the climate at such tiny concentrations in our atmosphere.
The earth is cooling asshole
It may well be cooling in some future period, but right now it's warming, and it's warming because CO2 is increasing. As soon as you come up with a plan to alter that increase in CO2, then it might cool, until then it's not.
the only cult are the few hundred people in here that can't read a graph
CO2 does not have a meaningful impact on the climate at such tiny concentrations in our atmosphere.
congrats on skipping school 99% of the atmosphere is oxygen and nitrogen, neither of which absorb IR from the earth,. that remaining 0.04% of CO2 and 0-4% water vapour however, does. Critically, CO2 floats higher than clouds and covers the parts that clouds don't, this is why it's way more significant. This is also why you can precisely correlate changes in temperature and CO2 going back millions of years, with zero knowledge of cloud cover during that time, because it's not that critical, the level of CO2 is. Higher temperatures also warm the oceans, which means more water vapour, so that's a future tipping point too, but we can't easily stop cloud formation so nobody is planning on waving a towel in the air.
These are just simple measurable facts, temperature has precisely tracked cyclical CO2 levels throughout earth's history, the only thing that is increasing CO2 beyond this natural cycle is man's global industrialisation that creates more CO2.
Change to industries that produce less CO2, or let nature handle this as before by switching land back to trees and let them absorb the CO2. The only thing upsetting this cyclical balance is man. We fucked this up.
What are your thoughts on information such as this: https://files.catbox.moe/nbkf98.jpg
Edit: Here is the source from that picture(Large pdf 100+MB): https://files.catbox.moe/48iu10.pdf [Evidence-Based Climate Science. Data Opposing CO2 Emissions as the Primary Source of Global Warming; Author(s): Don Easterbrook]
I took this information from this site: https://wattsupwiththat.com/2022/01/14/nearly-140-scientific-papers-detail-the-minuscule-effect-co2-has-on-earths-temperature/
Who is right, and who is lying?
What are your thoughts on information such as this
That's for the last 160 years, those cooling/warming cycles are just 30 year blips, the real global cycles are longer than that. On the orde of 100,000 years
Like that "warming with no increase in CO2" is just a 20 year period, apparently due to "sulphate aerosols in the atmosphere, emitted by industrial activities and volcanic eruptions", and subject to data collection variations. https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11639-climate-myths-the-cooling-after-1940-shows-co2-does-not-cause-warming/
how can a tiny amount of CO2 cause the temperature change
If it doesn't then you'll have to explain why the historical records closely correlate CO2 and temperature. What process independent of CO2 causes temperature changes. But it's true, this isn't a transparent correlation Remember in the modern age the variables are outside of any known climate model because it's not just 'vegetation cover = CO2', we've added lots of new variables by artificially removing vegetation, adding ozone, adding cows, adding CO2 from industry/concrete.
If you look at the tables tracking this, they are all different, so data appears to be collected in different ways. Even some effects like the medieval warming period wasn't global, that was just in Europe.
this appears to be the policy document on this: http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg1/WG1AR5_SPM_FINAL.pdf note from page 5 they list what is certain and what is just likely, because predicting where we are in the cycle is uncertain
(post is archived)