![Funny image from the page I was reading. It was so raw it needed to be shared. [800x1131 - 1.08MB]](https://poal.co/static/images/aOWMQo.png){kind=link}
For every tinpot dictator regulation there are multiple ways around it.
Oh and didn't science come clean that second hand smoke was harmless?
For every tinpot dictator regulation there are multiple ways around it.
Oh and didn't science come clean that second hand smoke was harmless?
but it smells funny "whiny liberal faggots voice"
but it smells funny "whiny liberal faggots voice"
No, said it was sometimes more harmful than firsthand.
No, said it was sometimes more harmful than firsthand.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/look-it-way/200907/is-second-hand-smoke-really-dangerous
Psychology today
gtfo. The same people whose studies are only 50% reproducible. Anyone in that industry's opinion is worthless.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6164459/
Maybe not as dangerous as smoking voluntary but still the assholes go about risking other people's health.
>Psychology today
gtfo. The same people whose studies are only 50% reproducible. Anyone in that industry's opinion is worthless.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6164459/
Maybe not as dangerous as smoking voluntary but still the assholes go about risking other people's health.
(post is archived)