Citing a federal agency that routinely lies, that has a financial interest in selling vaccines, and that has a demonstrated record of high ranking officials switching quickly to pharma executive positions after regulating in pharma's favor is not proof and you know it. Everyone else here knows it as well so what are you trying to accomplish?
like I said, there is nothing that can make you change your mind. so its pointless to argue. ppl can do 100s of studies and you'll say they were bribed or the results were faked
cites obviously compromised "source"
rejected
can't come up with a not obviously compromised "source"
"you guys are anti-science"
Faggot
cringe. apparently only real science says vaccines are fake
(post is archived)