![A Tale of Two Experts [680x613 - 508KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/cffCFl.png){kind=link}
Except he wasn’t the “inventor of mRNA.” Sounds retarded every time someone says that.
It's true if you repeat it often enough.
Like saying experimental garbage therapeutics are vaccines.
Repetition is the key of obedience.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2762315/
That publish date is 1989. He's the "inventor" of mRNA therapy in that he came up with the general concept, developed a specific chemical method that indicated that it was indeed theoretically possible, and published his findings over 33 years ago, leading to the actual development of an actual mRNA therapy.
In happier times we would have called him "The Father of mRNA Therapy," but that would be dreaded "Patriarchy" today. Since niggers can be "inventors" just by assembling a PC from a kit, Dr. Malone can be an "inventor" by actually creating a new thing in a laboratory.
“Inventor of rna therapy” is fine. But the wording always makes it sound like he invented rna, which is not man-made.
The term is mRNA Therapy, if you're going to break the term into components then wouldn't the hubris be even greater for claiming to have invented THERAPY? Riddle me that, Batman!
I think we can agree that "discoverer" is a better title anyway. Like Columbus, but exploring science instead of the Atlantic Ocean.
(post is archived)