WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

Some science is more shocking than other science?

O.C.

Some science is more shocking than other science? O.C.

(post is archived)

[–] 5 pts

The sign is perfectly true, but Crowder would never have the balls to sit behind it.

[–] 0 pt

Correct. If a person is on Youtube they have at most one working testicle.

[–] 2 pts

He is able to speak freely when banned from YouTube. I hope he’s permanently banned.

[–] 2 pts

Good Point. He might even be more enraged and become edgier.

[–] 0 pt

I wish their resoning was:

What communist propaganda is this? Misspelling nigger, and with a big B. Kick this shill from our platform.

[–] 0 pt

I think the definition of retarded was lowered from 85 to 70 because 90% of American blacks would be considered retarded

[–] 0 pt

The definition was revised in 1961. That revision specified the meaning of the term subaverage general intellectual functioning in a manner that was to have consider- able impact on the field of mental retardation. One standard deviation below the mean on an intelligence test was delineated as the point at which intellectual func- tioning should be considered subnormal (Hebcr, 1961). This specification meant that on an IQ test with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15, any score below 85 would be diagnostic of mental retardation. If the total population was tested and clas- sified on this basis, almost 16% would be diagnosed as having mental retardation. Even higher percentages would be expected to be found in subpopulations where minority status, language factors, or socioeconomic background depresses intelligence test scores. There

It used to be 85

[–] 0 pt

No longer louder

Also, trust the science