WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

related: https://www.rt.com/usa/540539-university-pedophile-professor-leave/

(post is archived)

[–] 5 pts

Watch these kikes closely. They say "minor" because they want to make it sound like a dude who's into high school cheerleaders with big tits. While that's not a good thing, it's still 100 miles from what they are. They're talking about dudes who are into Kindergartners.

[–] 3 pts (edited )

This. These jew lines of argument are meant to slide from;

That 19 year old was just in high school so dating that 17 year old is fine!!!

Into;

That 53 year old jew loves that 8 year old White girl and it's not rape even if she protests!!!

It's how faggot rights were swept in to include tranny rights which were swept in to include pedo rights. With that being gay should be a bannable offense as the mere act of being gay is supportive of pedophilia and child-rape.

It's a really difficult to talk about topic because of my first example of the 19 / 17 year old. Kikes will see an opening and slowly slide from 19/17 to 20 / 15 to 23 / 14 etc.

REMEMBER - ANY TYPE OF SUPPORT OF PEDOPHILIA WILL EARN A BAN. BE VERY CLEAR WHEN TALKING ABOUT THIS SUBJECT. /caps

All images, videos or depictions of any kind that show sexually explicit or suggestive content involving children (whether virtual or real) is strictly prohibited. Sexually oriented discussions (including jokes, stories and sexual innuendoes) involving children is strictly prohibited. Content or communications seeking to solicit, lure or entice minors into sexual activity or lewd behavior is strictly prohibited. Any image depicting minors in a sexual way at all is strictly prohibited.

https://poal.co/tos

[–] 0 pt

I only support death and torture to pedos. Hope that is clear enough.

A just turned 18 year old dating a 17 year old is not a pedo.

A just turned 18 year old with anyone prepubesant, IS a pedo.

[–] -1 pt

Just to be contrarian, that TOS doesn't seem to indicate that "any support of Pedophilia" would earn a ban. Not that I care if everyone who supported Pedophilia was banned, I'm just arguing that it doesn't seem to say that.

It says that posting pedophilia material (stories/images/video), or attempting to solicit, lure, entice minors into sexual/lewd activity is prohibited. All of the things indicated are already illegal pretty much everywhere with near unanimous support and it makes sense to ban for them. It's not illegal to say something currently illegal should be legal for XYZ reason.

While it's a fine line, I think free speech should allow any position to be discussed. It's just as jewish to arbitrarily say that any position on a certain topic will result in a ban. Especially because the different people will have different opinions about what actually constitutes Pedophilia, beyond the actual scientific definition.

There are many things that are quite obviously pedophilia and near 100% of everyone here would agree should be banned. Then there are things on the fringe that are not quite as obviously pedophilia and I wouldn't expect the discussion on their legality to be inhibited:

a 19 year old dating a 17 year old prearranged marriages with minors discussing a photo of a child in a bathtub as a baby

Short of someone actually doing something illegal, I don't think people should be blocking people's free speech if what they are saying isn't illegal, mostly because I don't trust people's blanket ability to interpret nuance when things are on a line where there is no longer 99% consensus.

This post is an example, I'm defending free speech and in NO WAY support Pedophilia, but it could be interpreted by some biased person as I'm indirectly supporting Pedophilia and result in me being banned if your statement was enforced the way you wrote it.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Slide elsewhere kike.

Hurrrr if I say I'm not supporting X while supporting X then I'm okay!!!!!

Free speech doesn't protect against anything obscene. Which includes any porn, regardless of age. 1st is clear. Fuck off.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

First line of the ToS:

By using Poal.co, users will agree to and comply with the following conditions. Your account may be banned for an undisclosed amount of time, or removed completely if the following agreement is not adhered to.

The following conditions:

All images, videos or depictions of any kind that show sexually explicit or suggestive content involving children (whether virtual or real) is strictly prohibited.

Sexually oriented discussions (including jokes, stories and sexual innuendoes) involving children is strictly prohibited.

Content or communications seeking to solicit, lure or entice minors into sexual activity or lewd behavior is strictly prohibited. Any image depicting minors in a sexual way at all is strictly prohibited.

https://poal.co/tos

[–] 2 pts

Yes. Destigmitize it. Do that to legitimize the well known fact that pedos aren't people and killing them isn't murder but pest removal to be billed to the state.

[–] 2 pts

I agree. After we recognize who they are, they get a quick death which is the most dignified thing we can do.

[–] 1 pt

According to OP we have just recognized one. Who's going to do the work on this one?

[–] 1 pt

Send him to a Moslem country. They LOVE killing people there.

[–] 1 pt

Ok who's going to send him?

[–] 1 pt

But Mohammed himself was a pedophile...

[–] 2 pts (edited )

They swapped "under age" for "minor" to soft sell this to the normies. So this new buzz word is used until everyone is too stupid to realize this is morally fucked up. The goal post to pedophilia has been moved. We need to reclaim pedophile kid fucker as the correct word from these assholes as much as we can.

[–] 3 pts (edited )

Be careful. These fuckers are slimy. They are experts at word play. However we choose to label them has to be a way that is absolutely clear that we're not talking about guys who get boners watching high school cheerleaders with big tits, we're talking about guys who get boners watching Kindergarteners. If we don't make it clear they'll pretend to be the former. Then everyone thinks, "well, is that really so bad?" and they're off the hook. Fuck that. These kike niggers like little kids.

[–] 1 pt

Can we just call them kid fuckers and let them REEEEE?

[+] [deleted] 1 pt
[–] 1 pt

METEOR

Militias Engaging The Enemies of the Republic.

aka

RWDS.

"Giant Meteor 2020" making sense now?

Regime promotes the very thing it claims it doesn't want.

Why do you think antifa and blm were allowed to openly operate when it was pushing the entire west rightward?

[–] 1 pt

Those who exterminate " Minor attracted people" 'deserve recognition and dignity , imho

[–] 1 pt

... deserve recognition and dignity" while they are being executed.

[–] 1 pt

Allison Rapp did the same thing while being a booth babe for Nintendo. She also moonlighted as an internet callgirl.

https://encyclopediadramatica.online/Alison_Rapp

[+] [deleted] 0 pt
[–] 1 pt

Interesting that these (((articles))) never show a photo of a (((pedophile))).

If (((they))) really believed their own shit, then they should add some photos.

That would be nice.