As a NatSoc, you support redistribution of wealth for worthy causes, such as raising the White birthrate. Would you concede that on just this one point, you are more communistic than Dankula?
No, I wouldn't, because communism is an inherently jewish ideology related to removing the right of self determination from Whites, rather than being a solely economic theory.
As an NS I don't inherently support redistribution of wealth, NS is more about supporting the community of the nation of your race overall. If that can be accomplished solely by tariffs (my personal preferred method) that should be chosen. But the wellbeing of the nation and the race comes above the individual in certain aspects (e.g., whether taxes should exist - in the libertarian view, taxes shouldn't exist even if it means there are tens of thousands of Whites starving on the streets and being unproductive). If a low rate of taxes allow for the significant furtherance of the White birthrate and race, that is a worthy reason, but it must be limited because as a NS I don't support taxes for their own sake to support state bureaucracy.
NS is more about the fact that it's NOT okay that communism and capitalism both support the degeneration of the people of the nation than it is about economic theory of redistribution (which NS doesn't inherently support at all, and didn't support during NSDAP Germany either).
(post is archived)