![Count Dankula [1329x1436 - 210KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/Dcadmo.jpg){kind=link}
I was assuming you support redistribution of wealth. For example, taxing bachelors to subsidize white families. That's fine, but good luck convincing me that's not "from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs"
I support making sure that Whites benefit White society. That includes incentivizing families. We would spend 0.01% of what we currently do in taxes to support these initiatives rather than all that money going to niggers and taco niggers.
There are a number of things in a strong nation that aren't strictly maximum profit endeavors that make the nation stronger and incentivizing families is one of those things.
It would still be explicitly 100000%+ less expenditure of taxes on socialist programs than we currently have. Assuming we even would need any income tax at all since I'd support extreme tariffs first and foremost rather than taxes, which are theft.
Overall my argument is just over symantics, I hope you understand we're not enemies
I do, thank you for conversing with me, I see nothing here to be uncivil about.
I find libertarianism to be a meme ideology because it inherently stays out of conflicts like, e.g., child brothels. Child brothels are wrong and anyone wanting to open one should be drawn and quartered in the public square, but libertarianism has no inherent issue with it because it's something the state shouldn't regulate.
NS on the other hand finds things like child brothels to be damaging to the moral fabric of the society and (correctly, in my mind) bans it outright.
Plus I find that libertarian societies, even if they mostly work among a population solely consisting of Anglo Saxons, are too easy to subvert, which we should consider obvious since we're living in the jew-subverted wreckage of one.
(post is archived)