Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] • 10 pts

You mean a 99.996% chance you will not shit your pants so you mandate that others wear diapers to protect you.

[–] • 3 pts

My diaper won't work unless you wear yours.

[–] • 1 pt

when the diaper-in-chief is in charge it will protect him

[–] • 1 pt

“You need to wear TWO diapers or you’re a murderer....and racism!”

Whatever happened to “you can’t argue with a crazy person”?

[–] • 0 pt

Pretty much. If you factor out the toddlers and the 80+ year olds who actually do shit their pants it basically doesn't happen in the general population

[–] • 4 pts

those that shit their pants will blame that on the people who refuse to wear the diaper

[–] • 4 pts

They are so far gone that they actually challenge these analogies in the stupidest way possible, often something along the lines of "clearly different! It talks about diapers, your argument is wrong!"

[–] • 3 pts (edited )

Imagine if they forced people to take a laxative along with the wearing of the diapers, then they blamed those who didn't take the laxative on them having the shits

[–] • 2 pts

%100 chance of humiliation

[–] • 0 pt

Not to mention, one that doesn't really confine the poo.

[–] • 0 pt

If I shit my pants every year, I'd probably wear a diaper

[–] • 0 pt

Where does this number come from? Is that the death rate?

[–] • 0 pt

Joke's on you: I'm shitting in your pants anyway. While you're still wearing them.

[–] • 0 pt

If you didn't wear Adult Diapers during the (ongoing) AIDS pandemic, you ain't worth it.