WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 10 pts

It is, in fact, the very basis of it.

[–] 3 pts

This falls flat with the average person and the pseudo intellectuals refer to studies that validate their "science".

[–] 3 pts

I dont believe anyone who has nothing to lose if they're wrong.

Scientist: "muy vaccine is the only way to keep humanity from dying en masse".

Me: Then logically you're buying stock in funeral home chains that operate primarily in low vacc compliance areas...oh wait, you invested $0 in your belief.

Climate Alarmists: "Muy oceans will rise 10'!!1!!"

Me: So you bought cheap property 10' higher than the current beach for when it becomes valuable oceanfront property, right? Oh, you didnt.

IQ Deniers: "IQ is fake!1!!!"

Me: So you hired a bunch of IQ 70 people to perform high skilled jobs at 20% the cost, right? Oh, you didnt.

Boomers: "Any degree is a good degree"

Me: Can I have a $50k loan to get a degree in gender studies that I only have to pay back if I get a national median or higher paying job with it? I cant? Eff off boomer

It's really easy to prove when someone is lying. Ask how much $ they're willing to risk to back up their claim. E.g. in March of 2020 everyone was panicking over covid fear porn and the stock market flash crashed. I thought they were paranoid, because even worst case Imperial College of Lies wasnt predicting a +30% mortality rate, but the market losing +30% overnight indicated that belief. So instead of panic selling for zomg appocalypse I bought in big. Who was lying, me or the fear porn "muy science" prophets? I made a shit ton of money, and they bet $0. Huh, shocker, the ones unwilling to risk a dime were full of bullshit.

[–] 1 pt

When people say "I (we) believe in science <here>" I always respond "That's not how science works, that's the worst word to apply to science.

[–] 0 pt

Like questioning that gender is determined by chromosomes, or that IQ is correlated with race?