Implying the entire van allen belt is consistently as lethal as the most radiated parts of the inner belt or that gamma radiation is inherently immediately lethal or destructive to electronics.
Lacked Fuel? haha what retarded flat earth youtuber told you that? It's not hard to avoid the inner belts and pass through the thinner areas of the outer belt on a variety of orbital inclinations that still allow easy transfer to the moon.
And you say I am drinking the koolaid. lol
It was a many hours long trip. Even if it's not immediately lethal, hours of exposure to the levels of gamma radiation in the outer belts would have caused significant long term health problems.
Why haven't we been back in almost 50 years? Why do we only send unmanned landers today? Why has NASA claimed that we no longer have the technology needed to go to the moon 50 years ago?
http://youtube.com/watch?v=16MMZJlp_0Y
Have you seen the old moon landing footage? Why are there dozens of scenes where the astronauts clearly appear to be moving around on wires, rather than floating in anti-gravity?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zz9Bzi_GyD0
Why does the lunar soil in this footprint clump together in a way that only wet/moist soil clumps together when dry dust/sand doesn't clump together like that? Note that the issue here is not just that it retains its' shape, as the bullshit mythbusters debunking video claimed, but that the soil sticks together the way that wet or moist soil would but that dry dust or sand with no moisture would not. There is no moisture on the moon that would make this happen.
https://th.bing.com/th/id/OIP.vZ-fgzhUEFOdp4wiNbcQEAHaFs?pid=ImgDet&rs=1
lol, and now you start throwing shit at the wall to see what sticks. Classic fucking retard.
I've argued all this stupid shit before, and I'm over it.
Enjoy being retarded.
So you have no argument against facts. Cool.
aww, i triggered and .
Poor little voat fagss couldn't take a differing opinion
(post is archived)