![Any claim to a leftist. [1000x600 - 68KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/cnPIeH.jpg){kind=link}
The point of arguments is trying to find the truth of a matter, if someone argues one side they owe it to the argument to provide evidence (sources). its as simple as that. This has nothing to do with being lazy, asking someone for sources because they make claims should be expected. If anything faggots who make claims that they cant back are the lazy fucks who need to shut up. Far too much of this bullshit going on where people talk wild bullshit and insist it is true without evidence, chances are if you are whining about being asked for sources you are a lazy faggot who cant make a good argument.
Or the sources require experiments which are hard/expensive to do, and the information of those experiments is very valuable, so better to keep certain things to oneself, out of respect. Again, I can point you in a direction, and it would take you a good deal of time to catch up with the background knowledge required to understand it, or I can try to have a discussion with you.
I don't argue, I propose a point of view, if you want to offer yours I'm all ears, if you want to compete for intellectual dominance, we can do that as well. I don't see how the latter is productive, the former can be a gateway for greater understanding. If you insist in being the alpha, prove it, lead, leaders do, they don't cry curse and plead when they don't get their way.
give an example of an argument that shouldnt require sources. I get the feeling you are trying to abstract this to the point of nonsense which is just a waste of time.
The sun is bright. Do you need a source for that? Temperature and pressure are related. You exist, shall I go on?
You don't lead, you have no answers for simple questions, rather you demand answers to stupid questions and somehow I'm supposed to put you on a pedestal?
(post is archived)