WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

kek I hate the term but it has it's place.

kek I hate the term but it has it's place.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

So either take someone's word for it, or forget it. Think of it this way, you get pointed in a direction, and because of your lifestyle you demand immediate results. Think differently, think long term. You plant a seed, tend to the land, and suffer under the sun, and you forget about it, then after time that seed starts bearing fruit. Then that little seed you planted gains meaning to you, because you physically experience it.

Therefore the Master acts without doing anything and teaches without saying anything. Things arise and she lets them come; things disappear and she lets them go. She has but doesn't possess, acts but doesn't expect. When her work is done, she forgets it. That is why it lasts forever.

[–] 0 pt

The point of arguments is trying to find the truth of a matter, if someone argues one side they owe it to the argument to provide evidence (sources). its as simple as that. This has nothing to do with being lazy, asking someone for sources because they make claims should be expected. If anything faggots who make claims that they cant back are the lazy fucks who need to shut up. Far too much of this bullshit going on where people talk wild bullshit and insist it is true without evidence, chances are if you are whining about being asked for sources you are a lazy faggot who cant make a good argument.

[–] 0 pt

Or the sources require experiments which are hard/expensive to do, and the information of those experiments is very valuable, so better to keep certain things to oneself, out of respect. Again, I can point you in a direction, and it would take you a good deal of time to catch up with the background knowledge required to understand it, or I can try to have a discussion with you.

I don't argue, I propose a point of view, if you want to offer yours I'm all ears, if you want to compete for intellectual dominance, we can do that as well. I don't see how the latter is productive, the former can be a gateway for greater understanding. If you insist in being the alpha, prove it, lead, leaders do, they don't cry curse and plead when they don't get their way.

[–] 0 pt

give an example of an argument that shouldnt require sources. I get the feeling you are trying to abstract this to the point of nonsense which is just a waste of time.