![Bad choice, Victoria. [560x600 - 359KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/US0Qo2.png){kind=link}
Women's greatest asset is their beauty. The idea that appreciating it somehow diminishes the woman is fucking retarded kike bullshit. The belief in that kike bullshit is one of the biggest causes of the decline of the west. Fuck off with that leftist bullshit.
Women’s greatest asset is their ability to bear children and keep them alive, a feat men are incapable of. “Beauty” is mens’ instinctive judgement of women’s fitness to bear their children, nothing more. If all women were hideous hags who were fat with no teeth and pimples, men’ would evolve to be attracted to whichever hideous hags looked the most fit to reproduce.
I suppose overly objectifying or commoditizing females could result in undermining a monogamous regime and promoting prostitution or polygamy, which lead to corrupt societies and low IQs. Theoretically.
I dont really think this is objectification here, although she’s got a lot of make up on for a track meet. Although Victoria’s Secret is a scheme to turn American women into whores.
Who remembers when Bob Dylan did a VS commercial? Lol.
Women’s greatest asset is their ability to bear children
Women’s only asset is their ability to bear children
Men’s only asset is to knock chicks up and support women and children. Why else do you think you exist? I mean two can play this game if you want to get reductive.
All women can bear children. So even though that is the reason men take on a life long liability when they marry a woman, it is not a metric by which women can be graded on.
“Beauty” is mens’ instinctive judgement of women’s fitness to bear their children, nothing more.
WTF do you mean "nothing more". That's a huge fucking deal. And it's not just the ability to bear children, it is the quality of her genes. The quality of children you can produce with her. What could be more important?
Obviously if all you can choose from are bad choices then you have to settle, but that's not a valid argument for anything. That men would have to settle for lack of beauty does NOT in any way diminish the value of beauty.
Beauty is a huge asset for men and women, and passing that on to your children is a big deal.
All women can bear children.
Nope
Many genes are not obvious from appearance. You can’t tell what kind of mother a woman will be from appearance. You can’t tell if she will cuckold you. You cant tell if she has a hi IQ. You can’t tell about a lot of important behavioral traits from appearance alone.
women’s greatest asset is their appearance.
It really isn’t. I mean, you’re free to disagree, but hotness is not an end unto itself. Neither is money. Thats why I think its stupid for people to believe men’s greatest asset is their bank account. Its incredibly shallow and myopic.
Sorta like ugly jews and their ugly jewesses
Right. Like the guy who signed Kamala’s stepjew to IMG modeling.
https://files.catbox.moe/r1bfwk.png
He was like “yeah, let’s see more of this natural semitic beeyuutee! Im in love!”
Yow. But evolution is crazy like that. Men will begin to be selected for traits that bring them reproductive success. Beauty is not objective.
(post is archived)