Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] • 4 pts

The (((wexner))) that owns VS was the one who was fronting epsteins fortune. Basically a meglobol. During pride month they had these two, disgusting fat dykes on the front of the store downtown, and an obese sheboon on the other. Completely repulsive.

[–] • 2 pts

Related from 2 days ago: https://poal.co/s/Sports/412740

Many comments, more photos.

[–] • 3 pts
[–] • 1 pt

I second that sentiment.

[–] • 2 pts (edited )

Thanks for letting me know!

EDIT: I did a quick internet search on her name and got as a result.

[–] • 1 pt

Finally found something Trump (and most hetero guys) and rapione have in common: they’d like to grab this athlete by the pussy.

[–] • 0 pt

I think most men would like to grab her by the pussy

[–] • 1 pt
[–] • 0 pt

Nordic and Germanic girls are supremely attractive.

[–] • 0 pt

Lmao. I thought they were using "Rapinoe" as an insult. Like a raping rhino or something. I didn't know that niggers name.

[–] • 0 pt

Black eyebrows; practically a nigger.

Also she should be chained to someone's kitchen and pregnant.

[–] • -2 pt

Why objectify women like this?

[–] • 11 pts

Women's greatest asset is their beauty. The idea that appreciating it somehow diminishes the woman is fucking retarded kike bullshit. The belief in that kike bullshit is one of the biggest causes of the decline of the west. Fuck off with that leftist bullshit.

[–] • 2 pts

Women’s greatest asset is their ability to bear children and keep them alive, a feat men are incapable of. “Beauty” is mens’ instinctive judgement of women’s fitness to bear their children, nothing more. If all women were hideous hags who were fat with no teeth and pimples, men’ would evolve to be attracted to whichever hideous hags looked the most fit to reproduce.

I suppose overly objectifying or commoditizing females could result in undermining a monogamous regime and promoting prostitution or polygamy, which lead to corrupt societies and low IQs. Theoretically.

I dont really think this is objectification here, although she’s got a lot of make up on for a track meet. Although Victoria’s Secret is a scheme to turn American women into whores.

Who remembers when Bob Dylan did a VS commercial? Lol.

[–] • 1 pt

Women’s greatest asset is their ability to bear children

Women’s only asset is their ability to bear children

[–] • 1 pt

All women can bear children. So even though that is the reason men take on a life long liability when they marry a woman, it is not a metric by which women can be graded on.

“Beauty” is mens’ instinctive judgement of women’s fitness to bear their children, nothing more.

WTF do you mean "nothing more". That's a huge fucking deal. And it's not just the ability to bear children, it is the quality of her genes. The quality of children you can produce with her. What could be more important?

Obviously if all you can choose from are bad choices then you have to settle, but that's not a valid argument for anything. That men would have to settle for lack of beauty does NOT in any way diminish the value of beauty.

Beauty is a huge asset for men and women, and passing that on to your children is a big deal.

[–] • 0 pt

Sorta like ugly jews and their ugly jewesses

[–] • 2 pts

Why objectify women like this?

It's what we do here at Poal.

[–] • -1 pt

I guess I'm better then everyone else on Poal then.

[–] • 0 pt

I guess I'm better then everyone else on Poal then.

Maybe not everyone else, but me for sure.