WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

The $16 an hour the warehouses here pay is more than some of the skilled technical players pay.

[–] 0 pt

Assuming your speaking due to Bezos and thus Amazon of which the vast majority of the money they pay is from tax payers, not from their own earnings. If he paid less than 1% in taxes what do you think Amazon paid while raking in biillions of jewfare.

[–] 1 pt

I don't disagree that Bezos is a fucking jew bastard that needs to have every last cent flayed from the skin of his miserable form, but if you're going to single him out while leaving every other corporation that wants a Master's degree for $13 an hour in the dark, then we have a problem.

[–] 0 pt

He was one of two. Thats not really "singling out". I dont know the other guy... The Oracle guy right? Forget his name thus just Bezos.

[–] 0 pt

... $7.50 / hour is absofuckinglutely livable. What the fuck are you pushing (((reddit))) for?

[–] 0 pt (edited )

If you adjusted wages for the federal reserve/other inflationary tricks they use. The average wage should be 500$ an hour. With modern productivity, workers should be paid more....not 100x less portion than before 1917. But no minimum wage is needed if they hadn't ruined the dollar.

[–] 0 pt

Great. That has literally nothing to do with what I stated. What could be is irrelevant. If all jews were dead this that and the other would be different! But that's a meaningless statement and you don't fix things based off of "could haves". You fix things based off of what is. And what the issues are is numerable. The primary issue is who pays the taxes and that would be the poor serfs and the why that's the case is because these poor serfs march, picket, and protest for these plutocrats. Another issue is the existence of (((international trade))) whose sole goal is to drain the US of it's material wealth.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Well your claim about how people should be fine living off 7.50$ is not true. That's not nearly what they should be getting, and with the prices constantly rising it only gets worse as the years go on. Instead of squabbling over which worker gets more of the workers 4% share of the actual wealth, while the rest goes to the elite....we should focus on the main issue draining the value from the system.

So? Let them spend their money how they want.

If they want to spend it on space, that's cool. I'd much rather that then forcefully redistributing it to people too stupid or lazy enough to make a wage.

[–] 0 pt

Most of their wealth is from stocks, they have a large number of shares and the price goes up. I highly doubt the markets are fairly controlled. Also the fed prints off money, and then it goes to their companies, making them richer.

[–] 0 pt

Maybe they're facing eviction because your heroes took their ability to make a living away for more than a year.

[–] 0 pt
[–] 0 pt

That's what happens when technology improves. In your world where wages match productivity 1 of 2 things happens.

  1. Everything becomes automated.
  2. Everyone gets paid more, but prices of goods are much higher as well.

Complaining of productivity increases clearly created through technology as a guide for wages is disingenuous.

If I have 20 people with watering cans watering my plants, then I install an irrigation system so 1 man can manage, it shouldn't be expected that he gets 20 times the wage.

There are plenty of economic issues, the biggest is that the cost of every need has gone up while the cost of frivolous shit is lower than ever. Much of this is due to government intervention. Whenever the government gets involved, things become unaffordable.

Like Healthcare, housing, college, food, and energy.

There has been fare more economic damage through altruism than through technological advances leading to productivity.

If we do see the wage increase you are looking for, nothing will be any different shortly thereafter when the costs of needs just rises to match the new wages.