Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] • 3 pts

It's not even remotely true. You can't sue a gun manufacturer for someone else committing a crime, just as you can't sue a car manufacturer for a criminal intentionally running someone over. This is true of every industry, but anti-gun (((activists))) tried to wage lawfare against the right of self defense.

[–] • 2 pts

And to add to that, you CAN sue a gun manufacturer for selling a faulty gun resulting in injury. Why does Joe think they have product recalls every other year.

[–] • 2 pts

>Joe think

You speak too highly of him.

[–] • 0 pt

Who should be way easier to sue for indirect externalizes is the government. Every one of use should be suing the government into absolute non-existence over funding gain of function. Complaining about gun manufacturers as being reckless just seems silly by comparison.

[–] • 0 pt

They can be sued all day. What they can't be sued for is how their products are used by the public. I'm willing to go along with a scheme to allow that as long as it applies to ALL products.

[–] • 0 pt

Cool, see the similarities? Both are capable of killing you. Funny how one's a Weapon and one's a Medicine.

[–] • 0 pt

One is instrument for survival and second is chemical weapon.

[–] • 0 pt

Want to know what can't be sued that is responsible for most crime? niggers. Want to know who enables them? jews. Can't sue them either.