> Just because your democracy became corrupt doesn’t mean all democracies are corrupt. You can't back up your claim, that's pathetic. It wasn't a trap, I was simply curious about the information/knowledge you had to claim something like that. Now your defense is that it's all meaningless anyway. You proved that you either don't know which Western democracy that was the last one to fall or it's so counter to the point you were making that you'd rather not say it. Knowing which one was the last to fall could help understand how it was so resilient. But no, asking question is trying to trap you, get a grip.