That's why having both is good.
Literally:
https://warisboring.com/extreme-diy-man-makes-akm-from-a-shovel/
That's why having both is good.
There is a reason why you almost never see a sub 1 MOA AK.
There is a reason why you almost never see a sub 1 MOA AK.
Theres guns for killing that guy way over there and guns for killing everybody in that general direction.
It's a beautiful neither.
Theres guns for killing that guy way over there and guns for killing everybody in that general direction.
It's a beautiful neither.
Sub 1? They're typically 4-5 MOA. Equivalent to a typical pistol. Which, considering their intended use and their cost, is acceptable.
There are other AK variants which are more accurate, and manufactured to tighter tolerances, including the Dragunov.
Sub 1? They're typically 4-5 MOA. Equivalent to a typical pistol. Which, considering their intended use and their cost, is acceptable.
There are other AK variants which are more accurate, and manufactured to tighter tolerances, including the Dragunov.
That kind of accuracy is stretching the utility of the weapon beyond 75 yards or so.
That kind of accuracy is stretching the utility of the weapon beyond 75 yards or so.
That's the difference: there aren't any reputable manufacturers making parts that don't fit an AR.
That's the difference: there aren't any reputable manufacturers making parts that don't fit an AR.
(post is archived)