WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Where was the money for this loan coming from? Their taxes. They were paying for their "free" loan either way.

White children are in everyone's interests. Taxes to support this makes sense.

Note that White people's taxes are now paying for nigger welfare, because jews told you diversity was your strength

[–] 0 pt

White children are in everyone's interests. Taxes to support this makes sense.

It's robbing Peter to pay Peter. If you take €20,000 out of may paycheck then give me €20,000 off my loan then you haven't actually helped me, although some particularly dim people might think you have.

Also white children are not all made equal. Welfareism is a dysgenic breeding program, nothing more nothing less. If you subsidise everyone to have more children, irrespective of how well equipped they are to provide for them, you'll be encouraging r-selection and the IQ bell curve will shift to the left. Do it for long enough and you end up with white niggers.

Note that White people's taxes are now paying for nigger welfare, because jews told you diversity was your strength

Yes, that's also bad.

[–] 0 pt

If you subsidise everyone to have more children, irrespective of how well equipped they are to provide for them, you'll be encouraging r-selection

Except what happens now is that more capable people will delay having children because they tend to anticipate the costs involved, so try to build a career and stability first. Feckless people will carry on breeding regardless, because alcohol and over-sexualised jew media

And even if the r did drop, that removes the capitalist case for immigration, because White poverty would make importing niggers uneconomic. (Biden doesn't just want new low IQ voters, he's appeasing corporations too)

Feckless families that drop into poverty create more crime and social instability (eg niggers), if specifically childcare was funded, woman would revert back to homemakers instead of trying to make money. This ends up benefiting White woman the most because they were the ones pushing feminism and zero children, she-niggers were doing the opposite, being whores and having random niglets regardless of financial stability.

Family is what White people do best and it's what niggers fail at. We can only improve our situation by rolling back the drivers behind feminism (ie job opportunities = money), reducing the numbers of single mothers by promoting children/stable family as a core social value, and providing stable family structures to bring up children. Which basically means funding people who have kids.

Hitler was better placed to make this happen because he could remove the Anti White jew from social influence, and inspire traditional nationalist values without opposition. Technically he also needed more people for a future war, but his plan had value regardless

[–] 0 pt

Except what happens now is that more capable people will delay having children because they tend to anticipate the costs involved, so try to build a career and stability first. Feckless people will carry on breeding regardless, because alcohol and over-sexualised jew media

Right, so subsidising reproduction is bad. It breeds out the most capable and responsible and promotes the most irresponsible and incapable.

And even if the r did drop, that removes the capitalist case for immigration, because White poverty would make importing niggers uneconomic. (Biden doesn't just want new low IQ voters, he's appeasing corporations too)

There is no "capitalist case for immigration." The nigger tidal wave is not being caused by market forces and freedom of association, it's being caused by centralised governments subsidising their immigration/reproduction and forcing them on otherwise content white communities.

Feckless families that drop into poverty create more crime and social instability (eg niggers), if specifically childcare was funded, woman would revert back to homemakers instead of trying to make money. This ends up benefiting White woman the most because they were the ones pushing feminism and zero children, she-niggers were doing the opposite, being whores and having random niglets regardless of financial stability.

Again, there's plenty of programs paying for women to have children. The result is an epidemic of welfare queens popping out babies for the support checks.

Family is what White people do best and it's what niggers fail at. We can only improve our situation by rolling back the drivers behind feminism (ie job opportunities = money), reducing the numbers of single mothers by promoting children/stable family as a core social value, and providing stable family structures to bring up children.

Yes

Which basically means funding people who have kids.

No.

We already fund "people who have kids" and the result is broken families and ghettos. Even in majority white areas. We used to have a society based around large independent white families. That culture died because of government subsidies creating breeding programs for the lazy at the expense of the industrious. We do not need more subsidies, we need less.

Hitler was better placed to make this happen because he could remove the Anti White jew from social influence, and inspire traditional nationalist values without opposition. Technically he also needed more people for a future war, but his plan had value regardless

Hitler happened to come around at a time when socialism and big government intervention were seen as the future, so he used the newest tools available to him at the time. That experiment has now been run countless times and it has failed every time. It is long past time to admit that socialism does not work.