They wouldn’t get it. [666x960 - 60KB] | Poal: Say what you want.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

Click here to see all the comments (75).

[–] • 0 pt

Except what happens now is that more capable people will delay having children because they tend to anticipate the costs involved, so try to build a career and stability first. Feckless people will carry on breeding regardless, because alcohol and over-sexualised jew media

Right, so subsidising reproduction is bad. It breeds out the most capable and responsible and promotes the most irresponsible and incapable.

And even if the r did drop, that removes the capitalist case for immigration, because White poverty would make importing niggers uneconomic. (Biden doesn't just want new low IQ voters, he's appeasing corporations too)

There is no "capitalist case for immigration." The nigger tidal wave is not being caused by market forces and freedom of association, it's being caused by centralised governments subsidising their immigration/reproduction and forcing them on otherwise content white communities.

Feckless families that drop into poverty create more crime and social instability (eg niggers), if specifically childcare was funded, woman would revert back to homemakers instead of trying to make money. This ends up benefiting White woman the most because they were the ones pushing feminism and zero children, she-niggers were doing the opposite, being whores and having random niglets regardless of financial stability.

Again, there's plenty of programs paying for women to have children. The result is an epidemic of welfare queens popping out babies for the support checks.

Family is what White people do best and it's what niggers fail at. We can only improve our situation by rolling back the drivers behind feminism (ie job opportunities = money), reducing the numbers of single mothers by promoting children/stable family as a core social value, and providing stable family structures to bring up children.

Yes

Which basically means funding people who have kids.

No.

We already fund "people who have kids" and the result is broken families and ghettos. Even in majority white areas. We used to have a society based around large independent white families. That culture died because of government subsidies creating breeding programs for the lazy at the expense of the industrious. We do not need more subsidies, we need less.

Hitler was better placed to make this happen because he could remove the Anti White jew from social influence, and inspire traditional nationalist values without opposition. Technically he also needed more people for a future war, but his plan had value regardless

Hitler happened to come around at a time when socialism and big government intervention were seen as the future, so he used the newest tools available to him at the time. That experiment has now been run countless times and it has failed every time. It is long past time to admit that socialism does not work.

>Except what happens now is that more capable people will delay having children because they tend to anticipate the costs involved, so try to build a career and stability first. >Feckless people will carry on breeding regardless, because alcohol and over-sexualised jew media Right, so subsidising reproduction is bad. It breeds out the most capable and responsible and promotes the most irresponsible and incapable. > And even if the r did drop, that removes the capitalist case for immigration, because White poverty would make importing niggers uneconomic. (Biden doesn't just want new low IQ voters, he's appeasing corporations too) There is no "capitalist case for immigration." The nigger tidal wave is not being caused by market forces and freedom of association, it's being caused by centralised governments subsidising their immigration/reproduction and forcing them on otherwise content white communities. >Feckless families that drop into poverty create more crime and social instability (eg niggers), if specifically childcare was funded, woman would revert back to homemakers instead of trying to make money. This ends up benefiting White woman the most because they were the ones pushing feminism and zero children, she-niggers were doing the opposite, being whores and having random niglets regardless of financial stability. Again, there's plenty of programs paying for women to have children. The result is an epidemic of welfare queens popping out babies for the support checks. >Family is what White people do best and it's what niggers fail at. We can only improve our situation by rolling back the drivers behind feminism (ie job opportunities = money), reducing the numbers of single mothers by promoting children/stable family as a core social value, and providing stable family structures to bring up children. Yes >Which basically means funding people who have kids. No. We already fund "people who have kids" and the result is broken families and ghettos. Even in majority white areas. We *used* to have a society based around large independent white families. That culture died because of government subsidies creating breeding programs for the lazy at the expense of the industrious. We do not need more subsidies, we need less. >Hitler was better placed to make this happen because he could remove the Anti White jew from social influence, and inspire traditional nationalist values without opposition. Technically he also needed more people for a future war, but his plan had value regardless Hitler happened to come around at a time when socialism and big government intervention were seen as the future, so he used the newest tools available to him at the time. That experiment has now been run countless times and it has failed every time. It is long past time to admit that socialism does not work.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

(edited )

Right, so subsidising reproduction is bad. It breeds out the most capable and responsible and promotes the most irresponsible and incapable.

But you can't control who breeds using monetary constraints. If it's expensive, White people just stop breeding because they can make rational financial decisions, but niggers will carry on.

Sure, if you got to the political position where all support for families was removed and everyone who failed ended up in Victorian workhouses, then that would have an effect. But if you can achieve that politically, then you'd be better off removing the niggers and jews from your society and letting social dynamics create the best outcome.

Once you have reintroduced social stability by returning to a homogenous White society, then you'd no longer need to subsidise children, because being responsible becomes a desired trait once again. We are only in this unstable condition because of the jew and its niggers, and continued White childhood poverty suits the jew the most, they want us on the same level as the nigger

There is no "capitalist case for immigration."

Yes and no, more niggers means a compliant workforce of Amazon shelf stackers and more low IQ voters to enforce the same downward cycle. The destruction of white communities is just a long term bonus for the jew. Amazon doesn't care what colour you are, just as long as you are more flexible than a robot.

Again, there's plenty of programs paying for women to have children. The result is an epidemic of welfare queens popping out babies for the support checks.

Right now we don't have a lot of choice. It's White welfare queens or a tsunami of niglets. The Right wing has always relied on the working class and its experience of Anti White inequality. The Left have abandoned them to support degenerate faggots instead.

We do not need more subsidies, we need less.

What would that actually mean for Whites? a sudden return to family values and the end of feminism? Because that didn't happen during the pandemic, women rushed to make OnlyFans accounts and now every kid wants to be a Youtuber...

Childhood poverty holds back White people the most because we have the most potential, a nigger with a welfare cheque is still going to be genetically predestined to become a violent nigger. But if a White child grows up without books or new experiences, that's a long term disaster for our race.

time to admit that socialism does not work.

Hitlers investment in children wasn't socialism, it was social engineering. If the Left can fund BLM and faggot pride rallies, then we can fund children. White values are family values. If we can't fund families then what direction are we going in?

Socialism fails when cancerous elites subvert it (the jew in Russia, Venezuela, Cuba), or its welfare programmes are overwhelmed by useless niggers (America, France, Sweden, Germany), or it drifts into dogmatic marxism and its ideology becomes its raison d'etre (China, North Korea).

Working Class socialism (when devoid of a Leftist political agenda) works OK (eg the NHS and education in the UK)

But then you've basically got Fascism, which solves a lot of social problems simply by erasing the Left's Anti White agenda

>Right, so subsidising reproduction is bad. It breeds out the most capable and responsible and promotes the most irresponsible and incapable. But you can't control who breeds using monetary constraints. If it's expensive, White people just stop breeding because they can make rational financial decisions, but niggers will carry on. Sure, if you got to the political position where all support for families was removed and everyone who failed ended up in Victorian workhouses, then that would have an effect. But if you can achieve that politically, then you'd be better off removing the niggers and jews from your society and letting social dynamics create the best outcome. Once you have reintroduced social stability by returning to a homogenous White society, then you'd no longer need to subsidise children, because being responsible becomes a desired trait once again. We are only in this unstable condition because of the jew and its niggers, and continued White childhood poverty suits the jew the most, they want us on the same level as the nigger >There is no "capitalist case for immigration." Yes and no, more niggers means a compliant workforce of Amazon shelf stackers and more low IQ voters to enforce the same downward cycle. The destruction of white communities is just a long term bonus for the jew. Amazon doesn't care what colour you are, just as long as you are more flexible than a robot. >Again, there's plenty of programs paying for women to have children. The result is an epidemic of welfare queens popping out babies for the support checks. Right now we don't have a lot of choice. It's White welfare queens or a tsunami of niglets. The Right wing has always relied on the working class and its experience of Anti White inequality. The Left have abandoned them to support degenerate faggots instead. >We do not need more subsidies, we need less. What would that actually mean for Whites? a sudden return to family values and the end of feminism? Because that didn't happen during the pandemic, women rushed to make OnlyFans accounts and now every kid wants to be a Youtuber... Childhood poverty holds back White people the most because we have the most potential, a nigger with a welfare cheque is still going to be genetically predestined to become a violent nigger. But if a White child grows up without books or new experiences, that's a long term disaster for our race. >time to admit that socialism does not work. Hitlers investment in children wasn't socialism, it was social engineering. If the Left can fund BLM and faggot pride rallies, then we can fund children. White values are family values. If we can't fund families then what direction are we going in? Socialism fails when cancerous elites subvert it (the jew in Russia, Venezuela, Cuba), or its welfare programmes are overwhelmed by useless niggers (America, France, Sweden, Germany), or it drifts into dogmatic marxism and its ideology becomes its raison d'etre (China, North Korea). Working Class socialism (when devoid of a Leftist political agenda) works OK (eg the NHS and education in the UK) But then you've basically got Fascism, which solves a lot of social problems simply by erasing the Left's Anti White agenda

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

(edited )

But you can't control who breeds using monetary constraints. If it's expensive, White people just stop breeding because they can make rational financial decisions, but niggers will carry on.

Bring back famines. Niggers only exist in the numbers they currently do because whites subsidise them.

What would that actually mean for Whites? a sudden return to family values and the end of feminism?

Yep. Without subsidies most "women's jobs" would not exist. We know this because every time governments shovel cheap liquidity into the market, men go unemployed and women's share of the job market increases.

Without daddy government to be their husband, women have to rely on men. There would be a sudden and conspiquous absence of strong independent women.

Because that didn't happen during the pandemic, women rushed to make OnlyFans accounts and now every kid wants to be a Youtuber...

See above, they still have daddy government, they don't have to worry about being an attractive wife. Even if they do get married they can always divorce and drain a man dry. That form of subsidy has to end too.

Hitlers investment in children wasn't socialism, it was social engineering.

All socialism is social engineering, and it all ends out the same way. Take darwinism out of the picture and societies start to rot.

Socialism fails when cancerous elites subvert it (the jew in Russia, Venezuela, Cuba), or its welfare programmes are overwhelmed by useless niggers (America, France, Sweden, Germany), or it drifts into dogmatic marxism and its ideology becomes its raison d'etre (China, North Korea).

Or it goes on for long enough and inefficiencies cripple it (Spain, Portugal, Greece)

Incidentally that kind of centralisation is also massively vulnerable to jewish tricks. If immigration had been the responsibility of the average american the Kennedies and Johnson would never have been able to niggerise america.

But then you've basically got Fascism, which solves a lot of social problems simply by erasing the Left's Anti White agenda

Pro-white inefficiency and dysgenics is marginally better than anti-white, but in the long term it's the same thing.

>But you can't control who breeds using monetary constraints. If it's expensive, White people just stop breeding because they can make rational financial decisions, but niggers will carry on. Bring back famines. Niggers only exist in the numbers they currently do because whites subsidise them. >What would that actually mean for Whites? a sudden return to family values and the end of feminism? Yep. Without subsidies most "women's jobs" would not exist. We know this because every time governments shovel cheap liquidity into the market, men go unemployed and women's share of the job market increases. Without daddy government to be their husband, women have to rely on men. There would be a sudden and conspiquous absence of strong independent women. >Because that didn't happen during the pandemic, women rushed to make OnlyFans accounts and now every kid wants to be a Youtuber... See above, they still have daddy government, they don't have to worry about being an attractive wife. Even if they do get married they can always divorce and drain a man dry. That form of subsidy has to end too. >Hitlers investment in children wasn't socialism, it was social engineering. All socialism is social engineering, and it all ends out the same way. Take darwinism out of the picture and societies start to rot. >Socialism fails when cancerous elites subvert it (the jew in Russia, Venezuela, Cuba), or its welfare programmes are overwhelmed by useless niggers (America, France, Sweden, Germany), or it drifts into dogmatic marxism and its ideology becomes its raison d'etre (China, North Korea). Or it goes on for long enough and inefficiencies cripple it (Spain, Portugal, Greece) Incidentally that kind of centralisation is also massively vulnerable to jewish tricks. If immigration had been the responsibility of the average american the Kennedies and Johnson would never have been able to niggerise america. >But then you've basically got Fascism, which solves a lot of social problems simply by erasing the Left's Anti White agenda Pro-white inefficiency and dysgenics is marginally better than anti-white, but in the long term it's the same thing.

parent
link