> If you subsidise everyone to have more children, irrespective of how well equipped they are to provide for them, you'll be encouraging r-selection Except what happens now is that more capable people will delay having children because they tend to anticipate the costs involved, so try to build a career and stability first. Feckless people will carry on breeding regardless, because alcohol and over-sexualised jew media And even if the r did drop, that removes the capitalist case for immigration, because White poverty would make importing niggers uneconomic. (Biden doesn't just want new low IQ voters, he's appeasing corporations too) Feckless families that drop into poverty create more crime and social instability (eg niggers), if specifically childcare was funded, woman would revert back to homemakers instead of trying to make money. This ends up benefiting White woman the most because they were the ones pushing feminism and zero children, she-niggers were doing the opposite, being whores and having random niglets regardless of financial stability. Family is what White people do best and it's what niggers fail at. We can only improve our situation by rolling back the drivers behind feminism (ie job opportunities = money), reducing the numbers of single mothers by promoting children/stable family as a core social value, and providing stable family structures to bring up children. Which basically means funding people who have kids. Hitler was better placed to make this happen because he could remove the Anti White jew from social influence, and inspire traditional nationalist values without opposition. Technically he also needed more people for a future war, but his plan had value regardless