![Don't kill yourself because consoomerism is good [680x925 - 252KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/l6YfsS.png){kind=link}
The way Game of Thrones ended he didn't miss anything after all.
In an alternate universe, dude didn't kill himself 8 years ago, watched Game of Thrones and hanged himself the night of the season 8 finale.
I would have hung myself after season 4, which is roughly where I stopped watching it because it was getting unbearably bad. As soon as that wide-eyed sloth-from-ice-age-looking cunt was becoming an "assassin" instead of the 5 foot rape toy she actually would have been in a setting like that, I was done.
Everyone except the character that sean bean played was some archetype of a Jew. Change my mind, or don't because you know its true.
The reason the show was so shocking was because they killed their hero in the first season, and didn't have another one. That's it. Once that wore off, there was nothing. A story without a hero is just a random collection of nothing, which is exactly how it ended.
"As soon as that wide-eyed sloth-from-ice-age-looking cunt was becoming an "assassin" instead of the 5 foot rape toy she actually would have been in a setting like that"
No truer words have ever been spoken about that story/show.
With jews you lose.
Sad thing is if you read the books you've had them spoiled completely and if you read them you also know that George could well pull off the events the show runners failed to execute, it's easy to tell that they are cannon. Bran makes sense when you can spend a half a novel rehashing Dune and digging into prescience, Sansa wanting to be her own queen makes sense if she would have followed the book arch and taken the Aerie after learning to beat Little Finger at his own game and having him tossed out the moon door. Dany dragon nuking Kings Landing makes sense when you have been foreshadowing the Targarian Madness and her slide toward tyranny for 3 books... D&D like 99% of modern directors are only capable of adapting source material and can't stand on their own worth a damn.
Books 1 -> 4 are fantastic, 5 is a lot of setup. Rarely do I continue reading a series past book three, really sad that George sold out instead of becoming the American Tolkien.
I know GoT gets quite a bit of hate and has earned a reputation of being a soyface show, but the first few seasons were legitimately great.
Still, I've seen this screengrab before. Sad how people base their whole existence on panem et circenses entertainment and deviant sexuality.
What exactly made the first few seasons "great" ? Was it just the deviant sexual (which were abundant) scenes ? Because the story of the Starks is very millennial soy induced. (i.e.. "girl = boy", raising others children, and kidnapping) The Lannister's are war mongering , incestual, and miscreants. Then you have the promotion of eunuchs, pimps, and "girl power" everywhere...blech.
The dragons themselves were well done CGI. That's no where near enough for me to say "great show". The insults and put downs of other cultures, ones own family were (again) nothing more than social sabotage for those who watch it. (normalization of what one does in those scenarios, and to those people).
I watched the show because of the hoopla it got. I was hoping it'd get better, it always got more sadist and terrible.
None of the above. I liked it more or less for the power dynamics and corruption, which I felt were portrayed realistically in shades of gray, rather than pure black and white morality of most high fantasy.
(post is archived)