![Capitalism & Communism; Two Sides Of The Jewish Coin [666x960 - 65KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/sog6uj.jpg){kind=link}
And who are the (((chosen))) winners? Is that a non sequitur thought, too? Tell me, what am I conflating?
Capitalism, even in theory, is kikery.
Civilization can not exist without Capitalism. Non-Asset Based Fiat currency is the problem, which is illustrated by Lady Liberty bound to a chair. Something based on a false definition (Capitalism conflated with Non-Asset Based Fiat Currency) is non-sequitor.
Civilization can not exist without Capitalism
I disagree. National Socialism would save the entire world.
Also, I'm aware of the difference you're pointing out. What asset should back a currency then?
National Socialism would save the entire world.
Newsflash: National Socialism IS a Capitalist system. It is actually a Party Technocrat Controlled Capitalist System. Basically Communism sans Societal Marxism. It grieves me to see that you are so ill informed about these things, but this is sadly typical. Plebs in our society are programmed with faulty terminology so that basic concepts about societal systems can not be properly articulated without deconstructing/rejecting the false definitions and using accurate ones.
As for what asset would work best as backing for a sound currency system, anything of value could work. The main one that has a historical track record is precious metals, of course.
(post is archived)