Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] • 5 pts

Typical non sequitor thought conflating Capitalism with Non-Asset Based Fiat Currency. And of course, Communism is in fact a Capitialist system as well. It is simply Capitalism which is controlled by Party Technocrats, and which denies opportunity from all but the chosen winners.

[–] • -1 pt

And who are the (((chosen))) winners? Is that a non sequitur thought, too? Tell me, what am I conflating?

Capitalism, even in theory, is kikery.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

Civilization can not exist without Capitalism. Non-Asset Based Fiat currency is the problem, which is illustrated by Lady Liberty bound to a chair. Something based on a false definition (Capitalism conflated with Non-Asset Based Fiat Currency) is non-sequitor.

[–] • 0 pt

Civilization can not exist without Capitalism

I disagree. National Socialism would save the entire world.

Also, I'm aware of the difference you're pointing out. What asset should back a currency then?

[–] • -1 pt

Capitalism facilitates the concentration of capital. Capitalism performs fine when competition exists, but eventually companies form truces and shift to rent seeking. Capitalism has a finite lifespan. Like any tool you need to switch to the right tool for the job and capitalism isn't perfect for every situation.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

Please feel free to offer any system that is not Capitalist in which Civilization can function. I for one am not aware of any other. I suspect that you are forming your thoughts using false definitions.

[–] • 0 pt

National Socialism. Markets are leveraged to improve efficiency, but companies are regulated to prevent trusts and other anti-competitive behavior.

[–] • 1 pt

but eventually companies form truces and shift to rent seeking

You forgot the third element: "and coopt governments to enforce their truce."

Without government intervention big oligopolies are highly unstable. The more intervention the less competition there'll be.

[–] • 0 pt

Companies and trusts don't necessarily need government to enforce their truce. The Light Bulb Conspiracy was one such example, but Standard Oil and the railroad companies also had schemes.

[–] [deleted] • 4 pts

Capitalism is not one side of the jewish coin otherwise the jews wouldn't work so hard to end it and implement socialism/communism. They have done a good job to get the younger generations hating capitalism though.

[–] • 1 pt

Capitalism facilitates exploitation with capital, thus, if you control all the capital, what is it but an extraction mechanism for (((those))) who own all the money.

You're hearkening back to a time before the jew, and even then, they were scheming to utilize your "idealized capitalism" for their own gain, which they eventually did, despite what Jackson did to stop it the first time.

[–] • 1 pt

Define your terms first. What is "capital"?

If you mean fiat currency, then the currency itself and it's accumulation is not a product of the market, it's a product of government. Government is the problem.

If you mean capital goods (ie. "the means of production") then we're living in an age where capital has never been more widely distributed.

[–] • 1 pt

He's just going to keep spewing jewish copy pasta lines. It's tired. I've tried on this website and it always devolves into at best muh worker deserves just as much as the owner!!!! Ignoring the risk, implying the US economy or government have been in any way capitalist since 1865. It's tedious, boring, retarded, wrong, and extremely jewish. I don't try anymore.

[–] • -1 pt

Capital is control of money.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

>Capitalism is not one side of the jewish coin otherwise the jews wouldn't work so hard to end it and implement socialism/communism.

You don't think they would defend the rent-seeking stock market to the very end?

[–] • 1 pt

Free Enterprise is based on the judicious use of accumulated wealth to create private property and more wealth.

(((Capitalism))) is the profligate spending of manufactured debt to create more debt and concentrate real wealth and real property into the hands of the (((debt counterfeiters))).

(((Communism))) just uses the power of state to take the real wealth and real property to put into the hands of the (((debt counterfieters)))

[+] [deleted] • 1 pt
[–] • 0 pt

hard work jewish

What the fuck?

hurrrr but jews taught me this about capitalism!!!!

Yes. Yes jews did.

[–] • 0 pt

I try to avoid using the term "capitalism" in arguments because it means too many things to too many people. The term is deliberately vague and muddied. Leftists will happily use it to argue against corrupt centralised governments, then use the support they gain to make a bigger and more corrupt centralised government. "It's ok goy, at least it's not capitalism."

[–] • 0 pt

I hear ya on that one, dealing with it right now, lol.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

I would have to agree with OP. Capitalism is usury.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt (edited )

Can you imagine that eighteen people in a capitalist country would walk by a girl slowly bleeding to death and screaming in agony?

As happened to .

Because the communist party made a law according which you'd have to pay her medical bills if you'd help her.

I don't recall ever seeing something like this in a capitalist country. Yeah in capitalism you get banksters and scam artists, but the common people would still try to help a dying child on the street. Even if we imagine a libertarian nightmare were hospitals might refuse to treat a child, the common people would still try drag her off the street into safety. Apply first aid. Call her mom. Anything but just ignore a dying child.

But yeah, totally the same. 200 IQ. You should feel proud about yourself.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

No problem. Glad to help clarify.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Can you give me a single example?