Your not reading it with the proper liberal slant. He said it was a victimless crime and he would have to pay a fine (likely court costs). What that means to a liberal is that he robbed a White person who can never be a victim due to systematic oppression, slavery, the holocaust, and the fact that they occasionally eat peanut butter. Additionally, armed robbery would typically get pleaded down for the first through 20th offense to a misdemeanor jay-walking charge. Therefore in his eyes armed robbery is a victimless crime typically punished with a small fine.