![So True... [750x976 - 89KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/CtIBMy.jpg){kind=link}
Because social security is really more of a tax than the "investment" it is supposed to be, but that makes cashing out your social security the other way sort of a reverse tax. That doesn't make a lot of sense to them. So why when dealing with the struggles and negotiations of how to manage all of the account congress has control over would they put a high priority on protecting that?
Because social security is really more of a tax than the "investment" it is supposed to be, but that makes cashing out your social security the other way sort of a reverse tax. That doesn't make a lot of sense to them. So why when dealing with the struggles and negotiations of how to manage all of the account congress has control over would they put a high priority on protecting that?
It's basically a loan that we're working hard to provide so that they can spend it while it's worth something and by the time we qualify for the principal back it's lost 80% of its value. Cost of living increases are bullshit measurements too.
It's basically a loan that we're working hard to provide so that they can spend it while it's worth something and by the time we qualify for the principal back it's lost 80% of its value. Cost of living increases are bullshit measurements too.
(post is archived)