strike killed 16 people and was labeled by the Russians as extremely low combat effectiveness, and happened 3 days after a chemical weapons attack that the international community was pointing all fingers at Syria.
We know the only thing that the UN can do without the USA is rape brown kids but can you admit there would have been some action from security council nations in response to what the international community was calling for blood for?
>strike killed 16 people and was labeled by the Russians as extremely low combat effectiveness, and happened 3 days after a chemical weapons attack that the international community was pointing all fingers at Syria.
We know the only thing that the UN can do without the USA is rape brown kids but can you admit there would have been some action from security council nations in response to what [you or I can assume is a staged or false flag](#spoiler) the international community was calling for blood for?
(post is archived)