gibsme [539x960 - 41KB] | Poal: Say what you want.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

Click here to see all the comments (107).

[–] • 0 pt

Im saying in a scientific experiment you have to take your measures the same way. We never performed 50 million PCRs to test for influenza this year or any other years. Measurement must be as consistent as posible. Apples to oranges. There are mild flu cases this year and in other years that are going completely undetected. Covid PCR tests are logged as “cases” when a couple stray covid viruses are detected in the nose of a person who may never have symptoms.

That is because they didn’t completely disappear. If you were doing pcr tests for flu, you would find people testing positive, just fewer people than if you were testing in other years. And positive people would have less virus per ‘nose’. Because behaviors have changed. If this behavior continues ( mask faggotry, social distancing, 10000 hand washings) , influenza A is bound to mutate to become more infectious. Influenza seems ‘happy’ infecting 50 million american a years with a mild illness. But if you prevent it from replicating in these ‘new’ conditions, more virulent strains will be selected for. Unlike coronaviruses, influenza mutates very frequently.

Sure, we've never had any serious testing regime for flus, but we've suddenly switched all our testing focus to coronavirus, and issued instructions to professionals to diagnose virtually every flu/cold case as wuflu. Therefore I don't see the argument that the flu has actually diminished this year. It's possible, but there isn't a lot of supporting evidence to back it up.

Occam's razor says we still have plenty of flu cases and they're being recorded as covid cases.

You could estimate the quantity or concentration of virus a few different ways but probably they are doing it by pcr. A large amount of virus will result in positive result after a small number of pcr cylces (amplifications) and trace amounts of virus with only result in positive results after a high number of amplification cycles. I assume they have modeled what quantity of viruses result in a positive result and what amplification level.

I'm not asking about the technical process, I'm asking about how you or I can be sure of that claim. The answer is we can't because the discovery mechanisms have been absolutely subverted. The same people claiming covid has a high viral load are the same ones claiming it's the new plague and we're all going to die without lockdowns.

I dont really think they have induced 50,000 lab techs around the world to lie for anthony fauci.

That's not necessary. If the ones designing the tests and interpreting the results are willing to follow the party line then it doesn't matter what some guy with a pipette says. They don't even need to think of it as lying, they can rationalise it as "finding evidence." Disasters are exciting, people don't have to be corrupt to be a false profit of the end times.

> Im saying in a scientific experiment you have to take your measures the same way. We never performed 50 million PCRs to test for influenza this year or any other years. Measurement must be as consistent as posible. Apples to oranges. There are mild flu cases this year and in other years that are going completely undetected. Covid PCR tests are logged as “cases” when a couple stray covid viruses are detected in the nose of a person who may never have symptoms. >That is because they didn’t completely disappear. If you were doing pcr tests for flu, you would find people testing positive, just fewer people than if you were testing in other years. And positive people would have less virus per ‘nose’. Because behaviors have changed. If this behavior continues ( mask faggotry, social distancing, 10000 hand washings) , influenza A is bound to mutate to become more infectious. Influenza seems ‘happy’ infecting 50 million american a years with a mild illness. But if you prevent it from replicating in these ‘new’ conditions, more virulent strains will be selected for. Unlike coronaviruses, influenza mutates very frequently. Sure, we've never had any serious testing regime for flus, but we've suddenly switched all our testing focus to coronavirus, and issued instructions to professionals to diagnose virtually every flu/cold case as wuflu. Therefore I don't see the argument that the flu has actually diminished this year. It's possible, but there isn't a lot of supporting evidence to back it up. Occam's razor says we still have plenty of flu cases and they're being recorded as covid cases. >You could estimate the quantity or concentration of virus a few different ways but probably they are doing it by pcr. A large amount of virus will result in positive result after a small number of pcr cylces (amplifications) and trace amounts of virus with only result in positive results after a high number of amplification cycles. I assume they have modeled what quantity of viruses result in a positive result and what amplification level. I'm not asking about the technical process, I'm asking about how you or I can be sure of that claim. The answer is we can't because the discovery mechanisms have been absolutely subverted. The same people claiming covid has a high viral load are the same ones claiming it's the new plague and we're all going to die without lockdowns. >I dont really think they have induced 50,000 lab techs around the world to lie for anthony fauci. That's not necessary. If the ones designing the tests and interpreting the results are willing to follow the party line then it doesn't matter what some guy with a pipette says. They don't even need to think of it as lying, they can rationalise it as "finding evidence." Disasters are exciting, people don't have to be corrupt to be a false profit of the end times.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

and issued instructions to professionals to diagnose virtually every flu/cold case as wuflu.

I just dont think thats likely to be true. But if it were we are talking about around 10,000 deaths that are attributed directly to influenza in a typical year. In the US. This is data pulled from death certificate codes. So lets say there were really 10,000 flu deaths categorized as covid deaths. Its not much considering the death count is half a million or so.

Overall deaths are up about 20% over 12 months. Something is going on. Are they shooting old people in the head or something?

You can look up the codes for some of these causes of death like viral pneumonia or influenza A confirmed or influenza A suspected and so on for 2020 or any other year. The user interface sucks but if you put the time in you can pull out the data for very specific categories. There does not seem to be anything super insidious going on at the data collection level. Im sure there are shenanigans here and there.

But at the end of the day I believe it is reasonable to conclude there was a massive increase in deaths over the last 12 months and that was mostly associated with people who developed severe covid disease, not with people who died of the flu but were recategorized as covid.

In a sense this is the flu. It is just a very lethal strain of it.

I'm not asking about the technical process, I'm asking about how you or I can be sure of that claim.

I would suggest that you read about PCRs and how they work and in particular how qPCRs work. They have been using qPCR tests to quantify viruses for years. I dont want to say that I totally understand the technology and manufacture process involved with all of these products, but I dont think this is just a case of a bunch of tik tok dancing nursing sluts who dont understand the technology they are using. We are talking about microbiology PhDs from every country in the world. They are often the ones who are inventing these tests.

Im telling you the severity of the illness is linked to the the quantity of virus in your body. Same with ebola. That is how it kills you.

>and issued instructions to professionals to diagnose virtually every flu/cold case as wuflu. I just dont think thats likely to be true. But if it were we are talking about around 10,000 deaths that are attributed directly to influenza in a typical year. In the US. This is data pulled from death certificate codes. So lets say there were really 10,000 flu deaths categorized as covid deaths. Its not much considering the death count is half a million or so. Overall deaths are up about 20% over 12 months. Something is going on. Are they shooting old people in the head or something? You can look up the codes for some of these causes of death like viral pneumonia or influenza A confirmed or influenza A suspected and so on for 2020 or any other year. The user interface sucks but if you put the time in you can pull out the data for very specific categories. There does not seem to be anything super insidious going on at the data collection level. Im sure there are shenanigans here and there. But at the end of the day I believe it is reasonable to conclude there was a massive increase in deaths over the last 12 months and that was mostly associated with people who developed severe covid disease, not with people who died of the flu but were recategorized as covid. In a sense this is the flu. It is just a very lethal strain of it. >I'm not asking about the technical process, I'm asking about how you or I can be sure of that claim. I would suggest that you read about PCRs and how they work and in particular how qPCRs work. They have been using qPCR tests to quantify viruses for years. I dont want to say that I totally understand the technology and manufacture process involved with all of these products, but I dont think this is just a case of a bunch of tik tok dancing nursing sluts who dont understand the technology they are using. We are talking about microbiology PhDs from every country in the world. They are often the ones who are inventing these tests. Im telling you the severity of the illness is linked to the the quantity of virus in your body. Same with ebola. That is how it kills you.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

I just dont think thats likely to be true.

It is true. Where I live physicians were required to record all covid cases and suspected covid deaths based on any or all symptoms, which we all know are identical to flus and in some cases colds.

Overall deaths are up about 20% over 12 months. Something is going on. Are they shooting old people in the head or something?

They did the opposite of their usual flu season policy: Instead of restricting access to nursing homes they actively moved infected patients there as "overflow," all while ignoring their emergency hospital facilities and the extra space they created in regular hospitals. That's where the excess deaths come from.

I would suggest that you read about PCRs and how they work and in particular how qPCRs work.

I know how PCR works, this isn't a technical issue, it's an issue with the trustworthyness of the ones making the claims. It's the same issue with climate change "research". When the people involved have a demonstrated willingness to lie or change narrative on a farthing, any claim they make should automatically be considered suspect when not verified by a trustworthy third party.

parent
link