![Exhibit A [1125x1207 - 123KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/qJqwPm.jpg){kind=link}
My first thought was that the indoctrination had begun before college, with this new online social paradigm that panders to the abstract, intoxicating feminine desire for validation, attention and sexual flattery. At any point they are able to access the young, the idea is to advance the arc of their maturation beyond an appropriate phase by introducing sexuality. A person is a vessel that is supposed to develop in its sophistication through a process, and interfering with this by advancing sexuality causes a person to become hypersexual, highly materialistic and a harsh schismatic oscillation between insecure and vain.
This makes them overly trustworthy of people who pay them compliments, makes them excellent spenders, and easily manipulatable through fear of social rejection.
Then, once they are in college, you explode that sexuality while at the same time cementing the psychology that will cause them to remain children. They are creating tantrum-throwing, attention-seeking, sexually rabid adult children who only know how to compete on the basis of sexual measurement and victimhood.
The reason college was this kind of nexus was because of what it represented physically - a separation point of the child from the parents and extended family. Isolating people, especially women, causes a trauma response where you can radically restructure her consciousness because she feels as though she has lost her tether to the world of the 'known' (her family/culture). That kind of psychology is the straightforward interpretation that is concealed by cultural myths, a sacrificial journey taken by men. The point of a healthy society and race is to NEVER let your women make that sacrifice. The second they believe they must is a death knell for your society. With college, we are literally sacrificing our women - this is incredibly serious. Even in more or less normal cases (she goes, does fine, gets a job, and doesn't appear broken by it, starts a family, etc.), there is still the sacrifice of the culture that she had been raised with, and so it will not be transmitted to the grandchildren. It is still emblematic of cultural death. If you don't protect women by moving them from one protected island to another, but let them go drifting, you've lost them. Men are sacrificial. They are prepared their whole lives for it, at least in a healthy society. We do the opposite with women, and for good reason.
College is still significant for that, but the powers that be are beginning to effect the separation of parent from child far, far earlier than college. Advancing the ages that children become sexualized is one part of that. A child naturally separates from the parent psychologically as soon as they enter sexual maturity. If you can sexually traumatize younger and younger people, you destroy the family connection. They're destroying families from the phones children are playing with in their bedrooms, while their parents are downstairs, hardly any the wiser. The true problem today is that all of these devices and the internet of things are putting your children in conversations with faceless corporate forces that parents don't take seriously because they don't know what to look for - it's already hard enough just to protect your child from the stranger on the street, never mind the one they carry with them that plugs into the bedroom wall at night. College used to be the first significant point where these powers had unlimited access to young people, but that's really a thing of the past. College is a step on the path now, but the priming process is starting much earlier.
Spot on as always, but I'll add this: Even in non college educated families such as my own, there was no cultural continuity between the boomers and the beyond. Its as if time began with them. None of my peers have any ancestral insight or customs left whereas there were generations who followed them even after arriving to America.
Its like an African tribe with no written history.
Excellent point, and that's a huge topic. One supremely important thing I'd stress about our Jewish enemy is how expansive their view is. Non-Jews can hardly comprehend it because we are so entangled with nature and the beauty of creation, that the Jewish urge to escape it means we literally cannot see the world the way the Jewish race has. Put simply, abstraction is the Jewish rule. Their heads are not 'in this world', but always stretched across multiple layers of quite sophisticated interpretation. Where we might look and identify something at the individual level, they won't see the separation: their machine is working at multiple levels, and they literally see it as a whole.
The 20th century could be thought of as a collective analogy for the individual situation we have been talking about. With the war, they separated man and wife. The entire nature of the structural change and consolidation of media that had been going on for a few decades conferred this massive authority to the federal government in terms of how we view them. It became its own entity, which in its larger-than-life authority became the surrogate husband of a generation of our women, the true 'man' of the house, while so many millions of actual men were being shipped overseas to fight the war. It was the government that consoled her morally, the government who delivered her the news (good or bad), the government whose programs gave her paid jobs, the government that set up social security and entitlement programs, the government who would pay her way when her 'damaged' husband came home from the war just to be obliterated by the weapons of psychiatry.
The Boomer generation was the collective analog of the traumatized college student that left everything they knew behind, and began to cling to anything like a lifeboat that appeared once they got to school.
Our women today are being wed not to man (as icon of God on earth), but to the authority of the State. You see it everywhere. I hear it daily, in women's conversations, in how people talk at parties. There is no such thing as an independent woman: that was the great lie. There is just a woman wed to the strongest authority that will give to her. This is also what made women so much more inclined to the secret and giving-away-of-life confessional of the psychotherapeutic movements that began in that century and really took off in the 60s and 70s (therapy is a cognate of the Catholic confessional). If the federal government is intervening in the life of your family in more powerful ways than the husband can, she will become wed to it (which is why you don't let another man mow your lawn every week). It is hardly even her choice. This shit is metaphysical.
I see the effects everywhere: women who openly disrespect and belittle their husbands publicly, who begin treating him like he is a cuckold that serves her needs, while her real husband is that State which would take half of his wealth on her behalf - if he ever went 'too far off the ranch.' That's what I mean. She always senses that differential power of this abstraction called the State tugging at the power relationship that exists between herself and her husband, this power that is greater than her husbands and which guarantees her safe escape should the natural struggles of life ever elicit the cowardly desire to escape to another fantasy.
In addition to the government, her attachment to the authority of her work place (in terms of the organization as an abstract 'person', but also to particular authority figures in it) is another way of fragmenting woman's wedding to the husband.
You began to see the signs and the influences in media, where the dopey husband becomes a trope everywhere. She and girlfriends are eyeballing the Hispanic pool boy making jokes about how their husbands couldn't make a pot of coffee without her, and then you hear a boom from the garage, he walks out covered in soot. He blew up the car. Cue laugh track. Devon Stack at Blackpilled does a really impressive group of videos on all of these films and shows targeted at Boomers. I'd highly recommend watching them.
It's also the point where history died, except critical Jewish historiography that took over universities after the War, combined with trends in literature and art of the same time that also worked to convince everyone they'd walked into a new age, separated irreconcilably from the past. The past becomes an abstraction and we are post-modern.
^ This should be front page sticky.
Cheers, fella. Thanks for the nod.
Incredible take, thanks for penning it. You're speaking the mind of us here who know this subconsciously but could never put it into words.
Just today I was listening to a podcast with Striker and Borzoi where they discussed that parallel cultures are already a thing, completely separate from the mainstream yet developed enough to be called a culture. A lot of parents are distressed by the sheer destructiveness and addictive capabilities of this chewing bubble gum of a way of life that's being forced on people and they don't know where to go. Like a Hollywood jew, it ubiquitously stares at our children from every screen and ad post, plays from every speaker in malls and goyfeed spots, priming them for slaughter from almost the day they're brought into this world. If anything, we MUST ensure that these cultures exist and we can find ways to isolate ourselves from the generic poz to at least keep sane.
I appreciate that, brother - the feedback as well.
(post is archived)