WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

Applauded by his wife, and wife’s boyfriend

Applauded by his wife, and wife’s boyfriend

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

So move to Saudi Arabia freak.

[–] 1 pt

As fucked up as Saudi Arabia might be, I'm not convinced arranged marriages are necessarily the worst way to build families. If there's trouble in the marriage it can help to have outside parties with a vested interest in helping them succeed.

[–] 0 pt

Young men and women need help making matches today. The family culture is failing because extended families have been broken up. So young people are often isolated and left to shift for themselves.

But forced marriage and teen marriage is just an opportunity for corruption. Because parents make matches based on what is best for themselves and not what is best for their child. Parents in places like bangladesh and thailand sell their kids off to wealthy men all the time. Its the culture.

[–] 0 pt

Arranged marriage isn't necessarily forced marriage or teen marriage though, it just suggests the family are the ones organising it rather than the couple.

[–] 0 pt

Saudi Arabia is the newest hotbed of feminism.

Women now have all the key rights, so it is guaranteed to go down the crapper. The last time Saudi Arabia started to go this liberal (1979), the Wahhabi radicals went ape and took hostages to stymie it. Unless that happens again, Saudi Arabia will be the Weimar Republic of Dunecoons before the decade is done.

[–] [deleted] 0 pt (edited )

Your ancestors frown upon you. You would contemplate running away and giving up your homeland instead of using the many tools they gave us to control female hypergamy and preserve their chastity until early arranged marriage. What a disgrace. You are no better than the cuck in the OP abandoning his heritage.

[–] 0 pt

Are you suggesting that males and females have equal roles in child rearing and economically supporting the family? You must, because that would be the only way you wouldn’t have hypergamy.

If male female roles are differentiated and males take responsibility for economic income and females take responsibility for homemaking and childrearing then YOU ARE SELECTING FOR FEMALE HYPERGAMY. Obviously if a female’s economic fate is tied to her husband’s economic success, females will be selected for seeking out males with more resources. DUH. Cuz EVOLUTION.

Likewise males will be selected for preferring females with the most maternal, and sexually healthy traits. BIg boobies. Nurturing qualities. Youth. MALE HYPERGAMY. Males will try to get the best partner for these purposes. This is why Donald Trump married up, to someone much more attractive than him.

It goes both ways son.

Blah blah ancestors

The earlier the marriage, the more likely the hypergamy. Historically only the aristocracy engaged in forced early marriages of young girls to older men and these were the most hypergamous arrangements. As always, the elites are the kiddie fuckers. And daddy was happy to oblige for a price.

Love matches were common among lower and middle classes in which the age of bride and groom were the closest and were significantly later —twenties. Self selected matches.

Maybe you didnt think this through. Probably cuz you’re desperate for any justification to fuck kids.

> males and females have equal roles

No. Men are not women. Women are not men. Women cannot find genuine happiness without patriarchy and motherhood. For millennia, Whites have use multigenerational households to pass down the family's unique and timeless traditions, heritage, culture, and stigmas. Women in these households would fulfil their lives raising their children, grandchildren, and great grandchildren. Mothers would promote good traits in their children, like chastity in girls and leadership over girls in boys. Fathers would look for mutual traits in their children and arrange their marriages to continue the tradition. (((They))), being matriarchal, couldn't stand it.

The subversive nuclear family didn't even last a century. In 1890, dating was extremely rare and very stigmatized. By 1910, dating was common, and nuclear families were rapidly replacing multigenerational families. This was no accident. (((Emerging ownership))) of 1900s media promoted the dating cash cow. At the same time, the (((leaders))) of First Wave feminism fought hard to lead women to date and advocate for women's suffrage and the age of consent (age of marriage). Since then, these have brought values to Weimar levels. The single motherhood family unit has replaced the nuclear family. Politicians voted in by women are flooding White nations with the third world. This is not White culture. We need to return to arranged marriage and multigenerational households. Nothing but patriarchy can fix this.

> YOU ARE SELECTING FOR FEMALE HYPERGAMY

Not with fathers making the calls. True, more wealth may correlate to better husbandly qualities as judged by fathers, but at the end of the day, the traits to be a good father and husband are paramount. Some matches will have different age gaps compared to others based on what the fathers find appropriate. White fathers in history understood that earlier marriage for men was valuable to protect against history's version of pornography and Nintendo Switch addiction. Likewise, as fathers realize the importance of pair bonding in marriage success. Soyboy's big mommy milkers pale in importance to chastity and youth. This is patriarchy.

> The earlier the marriage, the more likely the hypergamy

I direct you to the Faroe Islands. 30 years ago, they were a White stronghold. Then, they let their women "live life" (go to university in her youth and ride the cock carousel). The women didn't go back to their tradition. For years now, many men of the Faroe Islands have taken Thai wives and drastically changed the genetics of the Faroe Islands. The White women "lived life" and their hypergamy exploded, their homelands collateral. Women "living life" quite literally destroyed the demographics. No. Women belong in the home, the multigenerational household. This is patriarchy.

> you’re desperate for any justification to fuck kids

Fathers know when their daughters are mature enough to wed. It is abstract in our day and age, but not all women are 10/10 porn sex goddesses. Women age. Men are capable of loving their wives as young women, young mothers, mothers on their 6th pregnancy, wise grandmothers, and even venerated great grandmothers. Men can love the woman and accept the course of age on her, even if that woman isn't perfect sex goddess at the start or the end. This is patriarchy. We must return to arranged marriage and multigenerational households.