![Cuck-A-Doodle-Do [1125x1170 - 125KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/jN74Qi.jpg){kind=link}
> passive eugenics
Does the fertility rate bottoming out in a love marriage system count? Fertility rates are great in arranged marriage systems.
What happens if your arranged marriage is to a barren woman?
Uterus and ovary transplants are a procedure now. In the past she might have joined a coven, but with wombs "donated" by adulterers about to get a free helicopter ride in a world where arranged marriage makes a comeback, the man will be able to get his children.
I remember reading an account of a woman receiving her mom's uterus and using it to have kids, after hers was removed for medical reasons.
But so far as I know, if you put someone else's organs into your body they remain the donor's organs, genetically, so a commie's ovaries into a barren woman would result in the barren woman making kids that half-commie?
So move to Saudi Arabia freak.
As fucked up as Saudi Arabia might be, I'm not convinced arranged marriages are necessarily the worst way to build families. If there's trouble in the marriage it can help to have outside parties with a vested interest in helping them succeed.
Young men and women need help making matches today. The family culture is failing because extended families have been broken up. So young people are often isolated and left to shift for themselves.
But forced marriage and teen marriage is just an opportunity for corruption. Because parents make matches based on what is best for themselves and not what is best for their child. Parents in places like bangladesh and thailand sell their kids off to wealthy men all the time. Its the culture.
Saudi Arabia is the newest hotbed of feminism.
Women now have all the key rights, so it is guaranteed to go down the crapper. The last time Saudi Arabia started to go this liberal (1979), the Wahhabi radicals went ape and took hostages to stymie it. Unless that happens again, Saudi Arabia will be the Weimar Republic of Dunecoons before the decade is done.
Your ancestors frown upon you. You would contemplate running away and giving up your homeland instead of using the many tools they gave us to control female hypergamy and preserve their chastity until early arranged marriage. What a disgrace. You are no better than the cuck in the OP abandoning his heritage.
Are you suggesting that males and females have equal roles in child rearing and economically supporting the family? You must, because that would be the only way you wouldn’t have hypergamy.
If male female roles are differentiated and males take responsibility for economic income and females take responsibility for homemaking and childrearing then YOU ARE SELECTING FOR FEMALE HYPERGAMY. Obviously if a female’s economic fate is tied to her husband’s economic success, females will be selected for seeking out males with more resources. DUH. Cuz EVOLUTION.
Likewise males will be selected for preferring females with the most maternal, and sexually healthy traits. BIg boobies. Nurturing qualities. Youth. MALE HYPERGAMY. Males will try to get the best partner for these purposes. This is why Donald Trump married up, to someone much more attractive than him.
It goes both ways son.
Blah blah ancestors
The earlier the marriage, the more likely the hypergamy. Historically only the aristocracy engaged in forced early marriages of young girls to older men and these were the most hypergamous arrangements. As always, the elites are the kiddie fuckers. And daddy was happy to oblige for a price.
Love matches were common among lower and middle classes in which the age of bride and groom were the closest and were significantly later —twenties. Self selected matches.
Maybe you didnt think this through. Probably cuz you’re desperate for any justification to fuck kids.
(post is archived)