![Cuck-A-Doodle-Do [1125x1170 - 125KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/jN74Qi.jpg){kind=link}
Your ancestors frown upon you. You would contemplate running away and giving up your homeland instead of using the many tools they gave us to control female hypergamy and preserve their chastity until early arranged marriage. What a disgrace. You are no better than the cuck in the OP abandoning his heritage.
Are you suggesting that males and females have equal roles in child rearing and economically supporting the family? You must, because that would be the only way you wouldn’t have hypergamy.
If male female roles are differentiated and males take responsibility for economic income and females take responsibility for homemaking and childrearing then YOU ARE SELECTING FOR FEMALE HYPERGAMY. Obviously if a female’s economic fate is tied to her husband’s economic success, females will be selected for seeking out males with more resources. DUH. Cuz EVOLUTION.
Likewise males will be selected for preferring females with the most maternal, and sexually healthy traits. BIg boobies. Nurturing qualities. Youth. MALE HYPERGAMY. Males will try to get the best partner for these purposes. This is why Donald Trump married up, to someone much more attractive than him.
It goes both ways son.
Blah blah ancestors
The earlier the marriage, the more likely the hypergamy. Historically only the aristocracy engaged in forced early marriages of young girls to older men and these were the most hypergamous arrangements. As always, the elites are the kiddie fuckers. And daddy was happy to oblige for a price.
Love matches were common among lower and middle classes in which the age of bride and groom were the closest and were significantly later —twenties. Self selected matches.
Maybe you didnt think this through. Probably cuz you’re desperate for any justification to fuck kids.
> males and females have equal roles
No. Men are not women. Women are not men. Women cannot find genuine happiness without patriarchy and motherhood. For millennia, Whites have use multigenerational households to pass down the family's unique and timeless traditions, heritage, culture, and stigmas. Women in these households would fulfil their lives raising their children, grandchildren, and great grandchildren. Mothers would promote good traits in their children, like chastity in girls and leadership over girls in boys. Fathers would look for mutual traits in their children and arrange their marriages to continue the tradition. (((They))), being matriarchal, couldn't stand it.
The subversive nuclear family didn't even last a century. In 1890, dating was extremely rare and very stigmatized. By 1910, dating was common, and nuclear families were rapidly replacing multigenerational families. This was no accident. (((Emerging ownership))) of 1900s media promoted the dating cash cow. At the same time, the (((leaders))) of First Wave feminism fought hard to lead women to date and advocate for women's suffrage and the age of consent (age of marriage). Since then, these have brought values to Weimar levels. The single motherhood family unit has replaced the nuclear family. Politicians voted in by women are flooding White nations with the third world. This is not White culture. We need to return to arranged marriage and multigenerational households. Nothing but patriarchy can fix this.
> YOU ARE SELECTING FOR FEMALE HYPERGAMY
Not with fathers making the calls. True, more wealth may correlate to better husbandly qualities as judged by fathers, but at the end of the day, the traits to be a good father and husband are paramount. Some matches will have different age gaps compared to others based on what the fathers find appropriate. White fathers in history understood that earlier marriage for men was valuable to protect against history's version of pornography and Nintendo Switch addiction. Likewise, as fathers realize the importance of pair bonding in marriage success. Soyboy's big mommy milkers pale in importance to chastity and youth. This is patriarchy.
> The earlier the marriage, the more likely the hypergamy
I direct you to the Faroe Islands. 30 years ago, they were a White stronghold. Then, they let their women "live life" (go to university in her youth and ride the cock carousel). The women didn't go back to their tradition. For years now, many men of the Faroe Islands have taken Thai wives and drastically changed the genetics of the Faroe Islands. The White women "lived life" and their hypergamy exploded, their homelands collateral. Women "living life" quite literally destroyed the demographics. No. Women belong in the home, the multigenerational household. This is patriarchy.
> you’re desperate for any justification to fuck kids
Fathers know when their daughters are mature enough to wed. It is abstract in our day and age, but not all women are 10/10 porn sex goddesses. Women age. Men are capable of loving their wives as young women, young mothers, mothers on their 6th pregnancy, wise grandmothers, and even venerated great grandmothers. Men can love the woman and accept the course of age on her, even if that woman isn't perfect sex goddess at the start or the end. This is patriarchy. We must return to arranged marriage and multigenerational households.
I direct you to the Faroe Islands. 30 years ago, they were a White stronghold.
I did not know this. I heard that they were "hipster Iceland", but that's about the extent of my knowledge.
For years now, many men of the Faroe Islands have taken Thai wives and drastically changed the genetics of the Faroe Islands.
They had hapa kids with their Thai wives?! That's one positive I can say for the Boomers, for the Boomers I know who brought back "Souveniers" from 'Nam did not have kids with them. Unfortunately, I know all too many Gen Xers who took Thai wives home to the West, had hapas, and have not been happy. They are at least as hen-pecked and harried as they would have been if they'd just married a White woman, but they have the additional disadvantage of having kids who look nothing like them.
Reminds me of a semi-recent Verizon commercial where a White guy has an Asian wife, and Asian kids, and none of them look like him, for all I know he could have adopted them all as there was no biological resemblance. Majorly depressing stuff, poor dude has committed sua and doesn't realize it.
As one of our alt-right rappers put it:
Look at my [non-White] baby, she's so big now, she's beautiful!
and she'll never look like me, I gave my genetics a funeral!
Women cannot find genuine happiness without patriarchy and motherhood.
Well you arent in the position to be defining happiness for women since you clearly have never met one.
(((They))), being matriarchal,
They have been historically patriarchal and largely patrilineal in terms of inheritance. If youve had any contact with orthodox, you know the men are in charge.
Dating
They called it courting or wooing its been around forever. There was alway an age of consent /age of marriage. Since fucking rome and all throughout the middle ages up to the present. Fucking english commonlaw.
Politicians voted in by women are flooding White nations with the third world. This is not White culture.
Agree
We need to return to arranged marriage and multigenerational households. Nothing but patriarchy can fix this.
It depends on what you mean by patriarchy. Im skeptical of your proposal.
Not with fathers making the calls.
Fathers will make the calls that advance their own economic status. Everywhere men have ultimate say over who their daughters marry, 12 year old girls get traded as fuck toys and brood mares so the dad can have a new COW. Every single place where men are given this authority. Because it is a corrupting power. Like all power. And in these circumstances the brides are all very young. And the age disparities are large. Because daddy’s gonna get some bang for his buck.
All this trends toward a disproportionate amount of male power and increased hypergamy. Wealthy men will then hoard multiple young girls and poor men will have no females. Polygamy. Isnt it interesting that where you see the most forced marriages you see extremely young girls being traded for cash by their fathers, huge age disparity and POLYGAMY?
Unintended consequences of giving daddy too much authority. Males are just as corruptible as females. Evolution doesnt care. It dictates that individuals will tend to press their advantage when they can.
many men of the Faroe Islands have taken Thai wives and drastically changed the genetics of the Faroe Islands. The White women "lived life" and their hypergamy
So the men became race traitors and mudsharks? Because faroese women went to college? Good story. That will teach those stupid oil drilling whores. Their kids are going to have a fucking 90 iq. Why are men so cheap and easy? Hey we dont even know if those Thais are women. Faroes have gone down hill. XD
Fathers know when their daughters are mature enough to wed
Fathers know when they can get a good price for their 12 year olds. Europeans have been selected for monogamy and relative egalitarianism between the sexes. European women have historically had more power than any other female group relative to men. Maybe chinky people too. The further north you go the more monogamy you see. The more monogamy, the greater the power of females in the marriages. Faroese wahmens always had alot of power. There were increased options and increased sexual liscence for both sexes and faroese men just decided to fuck gooks.
Typical ages of marriage in england based on church records
https://files.catbox.moe/s8wan3.gif
Class differences played a great role in when a couple could marry; the wealthier that a couple was, the likelier that they were to marry earlier. Noblewomen and gentlewomen married early, but they were a small minority;[24] a thousand marriage certificates issued by the Diocese of Canterbury between 1619 and 1660 show that only one bride was aged thirteen years, four were fifteen, twelve were sixteen, seventeen were seventeen, and the other 966 of the brides were aged nineteen years or older when they married for the first time. The church stipulated that both the bride and groom must be at least 21 years of age to marry without the consent of their families; the most common ages of marriage were 22 for women, 24 for men; the median ages were 22.8 for women and 25.5 for men; the average ages were 24 years for women and nearly 28 years for men. The youngest brides were nobility and gentry.[25]
-Peter Laslett https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hajnal_line
Look at these ages
https://files.catbox.moe/bhm31v.jpeg
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3002115/table/T1/?report=objectonly
(post is archived)