Good point. At the time before all this social justice crap, the majority of women didnt want want the right to vote. It was a small minority of Jewish lead “civil rights” activist who lead the push for the 19th.
Not only that, but there were plenty of intelligent women actively opposed to it. People have this manipulated, stupid mindset that before the 20th century women were just locked in the closest and only let out for breeding purposes. Women actually had a HUGE role in society before they could vote, and it was a very important one, as we can see today now that they've been convinced to hate being women.
A typical young woman would marry, get pregnant and raise the kids. That's crucially important in and over itself, but then the kids would grow up and not need their moms so much...this is what people forget...then women would be come "mothers of the community". I mean that they would take their maternal inclinations and skills out of the home and into the local neighborhood/community. They'd run charities, feed the old and poor, organize community events.
Neighbors having dinner together and neighborhood dances, meals, etc. didn't just happen by accident. Older women who no longer needed to mother their children organized all of that. And if you ask me, our world today would be much better, and much healthier, if women started being actual women again.
You want to know why "the people" can't seem to organize against "them"...because we lack women doing what they'd naturally do and keeping our local communities organized in the most basic of ways in the first place. Women have a CRUCIALLY important role in society beyond mothering their own children, and that's called mothering the community.
I would argue that natural inclination of theirs has simply been hijacked to find it's outlet in the international welfare state we currently see, when that feminine energy should be focused locally on what used to be called charity. Genuine charity only works on the local level.
Dear God, people act like we'd have to move a mountain to fix this shit...NO...give us a decade of just letting us be like we'd naturally be and you'd be amazed how quickly we'd heal ourselves.
“The slogan ’emancipation of women’ was invented by Jewish intellectuals, and its content was formed by the same spirit. In the really good times of German life, the German woman had no need to emancipate herself. She possessed exactly what nature had given her to administer and preserve; just as the man in his good times had no need to fear that he would be ousted from his position in relation to the woman.
If the man’s world is said to be the State, his struggle, his readiness to devote his powers to the service of the community, then it may perhaps be said that the woman’s is a smaller world. For her world is her husband, her family, her children, and her home. But what would become of the greater world if there were no one to tend and care for the smaller one? How could the greater world survive if there were no one to make the cares of the smaller world the content of their lives?
No, the greater world is built on the foundation of this smaller world. This great world cannot survive if the smaller world is not stable. Providence has entrusted to the woman the cares of that world which is her very own, and only on the basis of this smaller world can the man’s world be formed and built up. The two worlds are not antagonistic. They complement each other, they belong together just as man and woman belong together.
We do not consider it correct for the woman to interfere in the world of the man, in his main sphere. We consider it natural if these two worlds remain distinct. To the one belongs the strength of feeling, the strength of the soul. To the other belongs the strength of vision, of toughness, of decision, and of the willingness to act. In the one case this strength demands the willingness of the woman to risk her life to preserve this important cell and to multiply it, and in the other case it demands from the man the readiness to safeguard life.
The sacrifices which the man makes in the struggle of his nation, the woman makes in the preservation of that nation in individual cases. What the man gives in courage on the battlefield, the woman gives in eternal self-sacrifice, in eternal pain and suffering. Every child that a woman brings into the world is a battle, a battle waged for the existence of her people. And both must therefore mutually value and respect each other when they see that each performs the task that Nature and Providence have ordained. And this mutual respect will necessarily result from this separation of the functions of each.
It is not true, as Jewish intellectuals assert, that respect depends on the overlapping of the spheres of activity of the sexes; this respect demands that neither sex should try to do that which belongs to the sphere of the other. It lies in the last resort in the fact that each knows that the other is doing everything necessary to maintain the whole community. So our women’s movement is for us not something which inscribes on its banner as its program the fight against men, but something which has as its program the common fight together with men. For the new National Socialist national community acquires a firm basis, precisely because we have gained the trust of millions of women as fanatical comrades…
Whereas previously the programs of the liberal, intellectualist women’s movements contained many points, the program of our National Socialist women’s movement has but one single point, and that point is the child, that tiny creature which must be born and grow strong and which alone gives meaning to the whole life-struggle.”
Adolf Hitler.
I clapped
(post is archived)