It was resonant up to the point you referenced the work of someone else.
I don't delegate my soul search to someone I barely know. Unless you grew up with the author or knew her for years, what you take in as your own philosophy from the book is nothing better than taking an advice from an instagram influencer.
If your experience is what convinced you, then you didn't need the teachings of the book. And if the teachings of the book was part of your many experiences, was there a need to bring up the book specifically without actually discussing the principles and merits?
You're only digging a bigger hole for yourself. This whole time, besides the initial "death is fake", you didn't bother to bring up other core tenets. All you have done was "just read the book, it'll tell you".
If you can't discuss the principles without wholly perusing the book, you either don't understand the book entirely or the principles in the book are weak. The true principles do not need to be represented in the guise of a scripture. It stands on its own.
(post is archived)