![The left pivots on a dime [1170x621 - 74KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/kYsDj5.jpg){kind=link}
You have to* admit that burning down a Target and breaking & entering the Federal Capitol to vandalize, steal, and threaten officials are two wildly different scenarios.
*You don’t have to, but that doesn’t make it less true.
Yes they are. Which is why it makes sense to examine the nuance of the situations as well as the narratives. I don't remember any major democrats disavowing CHAZ for example. I do remember Harris talking to Colbert with a big smile on its face, a back drop of burning cities emphasizing its Luciferian glee . Trump has condemned the actions at the Capitol and emphasized peaceful demonstration and is pilloried nonetheless. I expect most of those Boomer looking types who turn out for Trump would not endorse property destruction, they want to MAGA not Burn Loot Murder. They are condemned and attacked nonetheless.
remember Harris talking to Colbert with a big smile on its face, a back drop of burning cities
I don’t recall seeing this.
expect most of those Boomer looking types who turn out for Trump would not endorse property destruction, they want to MAGA not Burn Loot Murder
I think the evidence from the Capitol speaks for itself, that mob mentality quickly takes over. And as for murder, there are many folks here who see violence as a solution. Do you? That covers loot and murder. It’s hard to say who thought planting bombs was a good idea, but that covers the burn. The “situation” at the Capitol was akin to a chimp out.
The scenes at the capitol were unfortunate but more consistent with antifa modus operandi than a large gathering of Trump supporters which leads me to believe it was the action of agent provocateurs wearing MAGA regalia. The deep state could afford the entire cast of characters who strolled through the halls of power. It was hardly a sustained assault. I, like most sane people, do not want any violence. I want peoples God given rights to be respected. It is an unfortunate truth that some people resort to violence seeking to take those human rights
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NTg1ynIPGls ABout 5:20 in. Its not quite as dramatic as my memory but American cities were being looted and burned at this time and Harris is laughing and clapping. The whole interview shows some of hypocrisy but Stephen Colbert is a lolita express riding pervert who toes the party line
Correct, threats and intimidation when targeting normal citizens is criminal. When targeting federal officials it's protected speech and an important part of keeping the government honest.
“Criminal threat” is a crime and not protected speech.
Yep, that's what I said, when you threaten a private citizen it's a crime.
Threatening to put your feet on pelosi's desk is not a crime.
(post is archived)