![The left pivots on a dime [1170x621 - 74KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/kYsDj5.jpg){kind=link}
"Truth and morals" are determined by their agenda/objective. We expect nothing but this kind of hypocrisy.
"Truth and morals" are determined by their agenda/objective. We expect nothing but this kind of hypocrisy.
Goldfish are out here saying "damn these guys have short memories".
Goldfish are out here saying "damn these guys have short memories".
Don't mistake evil for ignorance. They know what they did, they just don't like when you show any resistance.
Don't mistake evil for ignorance. They know what they did, they just don't like when you show any resistance.
Well we are 20 IQ points away from the average person being replaceable with chimps.
Well we are 20 IQ points away from the average person being replaceable with chimps.
It’s all about the narrative.
It’s all about the narrative.
You have to* admit that burning down a Target and breaking & entering the Federal Capitol to vandalize, steal, and threaten officials are two wildly different scenarios.
*You don’t have to, but that doesn’t make it less true.
You have to* admit that burning down a Target and breaking & entering the Federal Capitol to vandalize, steal, and threaten officials are two wildly different scenarios.
*You don’t *have to*, but that doesn’t make it less true.
Yes they are. Which is why it makes sense to examine the nuance of the situations as well as the narratives. I don't remember any major democrats disavowing CHAZ for example. I do remember Harris talking to Colbert with a big smile on its face, a back drop of burning cities emphasizing its Luciferian glee . Trump has condemned the actions at the Capitol and emphasized peaceful demonstration and is pilloried nonetheless. I expect most of those Boomer looking types who turn out for Trump would not endorse property destruction, they want to MAGA not Burn Loot Murder. They are condemned and attacked nonetheless.
Yes they are. Which is why it makes sense to examine the nuance of the situations as well as the narratives. I don't remember any major democrats disavowing CHAZ for example. I do remember Harris talking to Colbert with a big smile on its face, a back drop of burning cities emphasizing its Luciferian glee . Trump has condemned the actions at the Capitol and emphasized peaceful demonstration and is pilloried nonetheless. I expect most of those Boomer looking types who turn out for Trump would not endorse property destruction, they want to MAGA not Burn Loot Murder. They are condemned and attacked nonetheless.
remember Harris talking to Colbert with a big smile on its face, a back drop of burning cities
I don’t recall seeing this.
expect most of those Boomer looking types who turn out for Trump would not endorse property destruction, they want to MAGA not Burn Loot Murder
I think the evidence from the Capitol speaks for itself, that mob mentality quickly takes over. And as for murder, there are many folks here who see violence as a solution. Do you? That covers loot and murder. It’s hard to say who thought planting bombs was a good idea, but that covers the burn. The “situation” at the Capitol was akin to a chimp out.
> remember Harris talking to Colbert with a big smile on its face, a back drop of burning cities
I don’t recall seeing this.
> expect most of those Boomer looking types who turn out for Trump would not endorse property destruction, they want to MAGA not Burn Loot Murder
I think the evidence from the Capitol speaks for itself, that mob mentality quickly takes over. And as for murder, there are many folks here who see violence as a solution. Do you? That covers loot and murder. It’s hard to say who thought planting bombs was a good idea, but that covers the burn. The “situation” at the Capitol was akin to a chimp out.
The scenes at the capitol were unfortunate but more consistent with antifa modus operandi than a large gathering of Trump supporters which leads me to believe it was the action of agent provocateurs wearing MAGA regalia. The deep state could afford the entire cast of characters who strolled through the halls of power. It was hardly a sustained assault. I, like most sane people, do not want any violence. I want peoples God given rights to be respected. It is an unfortunate truth that some people resort to violence seeking to take those human rights
The scenes at the capitol were unfortunate but more consistent with antifa modus operandi than a large gathering of Trump supporters which leads me to believe it was the action of agent provocateurs wearing MAGA regalia. The deep state could afford the entire cast of characters who strolled through the halls of power. It was hardly a sustained assault. I, like most sane people, do not want any violence. I want peoples God given rights to be respected. It is an unfortunate truth that some people resort to violence seeking to take those human rights
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NTg1ynIPGls ABout 5:20 in. Its not quite as dramatic as my memory but American cities were being looted and burned at this time and Harris is laughing and clapping. The whole interview shows some of hypocrisy but Stephen Colbert is a lolita express riding pervert who toes the party line
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NTg1ynIPGls ABout 5:20 in. Its not quite as dramatic as my memory but American cities were being looted and burned at this time and Harris is laughing and clapping. The whole interview shows some of hypocrisy but Stephen Colbert is a lolita express riding pervert who toes the party line
Correct, threats and intimidation when targeting normal citizens is criminal. When targeting federal officials it's protected speech and an important part of keeping the government honest.
Correct, threats and intimidation when targeting normal citizens is criminal. When targeting federal officials it's protected speech and an important part of keeping the government honest.
“Criminal threat” is a crime and not protected speech.
“Criminal threat” is a crime and not protected speech.
Yep, that's what I said, when you threaten a private citizen it's a crime.
Threatening to put your feet on pelosi's desk is not a crime.
Yep, that's what I said, when you threaten a private citizen it's a crime.
Threatening to put your feet on pelosi's desk is not a crime.
That's why I'm not really worried. They are so delicate. Their emotions state is always one bad word from complete collapse. The leftists I know are fucking weak as fuck people.
That's why I'm not really worried. They are so *delicate*. Their emotions state is always one bad word from complete collapse. The leftists I know are fucking weak as fuck people.
No, they're psychopaths who are acting delicate. They can turn on a dime because it's all an act to hide their malice. You should be worried because there is no crueler master than a leftist. Except, perhaps, a jew.
No, they're psychopaths who are acting delicate. They can turn on a dime because it's all an act to hide their malice. You should be worried because there is no crueler master than a leftist. Except, perhaps, a jew.
And the right Is always on the defense... Reacting to being bullied and playing the victim...
The left is spewing lies, you just need to call it what it is.. Mental illness.. Vote of NO CONFIDENCE in the Government. They are all nuts.
And the right Is always on the defense... Reacting to being bullied and playing the victim...
The left is spewing lies, you just need to call it what it is.. Mental illness..
Vote of NO CONFIDENCE in the Government. They are all nuts.
It's an old meme, sir, but it checks out.
It's an old meme, sir, but it checks out.
Only if you blindly listen to what they are saying, instead of paying attention to what they are doing.
The actions they take, and the consequences that follow, are completely consistent and linear.
Only if you blindly listen to what they are saying, instead of paying attention to what they are doing.
The actions they take, and the consequences that follow, are completely consistent and linear.
They are so nimble.
They are so nimble.
(post is archived)