Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (24).
[–] • 2 pts

How do you reconcile shooting a clearly unarmed woman that is not a threat? Deadly force is the last resort -- could he have not just subdued her instead? Looked like a big guy.

[–] • 1 pt

I don't justify it at all, didn't need to happen, however if we want to be consistent by telling others 'they shouldn't have broken the law, they shouldn't have resisted, they shouldn't ran etc etc', then she clearly shouldn't have been in there trespassing, nor climbing up in a fcking window frame of a barricaded door where there is an armed guard on the other side pointing a f King pistol directly at her. Can you answer, why she was up in the broken window of the door?? Serious question, bc they certainly didn't shoot anyone else in there given the opportunity...

[–] • 1 pt

The capital is owned by the people. It is OUR HOUSE to invade if we have a grievance, and the grievance is that the government is accepting fake elections.

The consent of the governed has been betrayed, therefore the government is illegitimate.

[–] • 0 pt

I don't disagree ... Is anyone surprised then, when law enforcement 'shoot unarmed citizens', if the govt they are delegated authority from is indeed illegitimate ?? ....