WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 6 pts 3y

The regulations will be written by the people the banks are paying.

[–] 5 pts 3y

Be interested in seeing a video of the level two while this is going on.

[–] 4 pts 3y (edited 3y)

I'm doing day trade shorting of stocks.

Only if it is available to short.

Setup an "One cancels other" bracket and you're greatly protected against reversal where price explodes back up. It's the same trading on the way down as on the way up. Folks just don't use the OCO brackets to protect themselves from a huge price move.

That said...

I think companies should get to choose whether or not they are shortable. You can drive price down in the same way that guy describes shorting. But it would require you have a large position. That would also mean you have cheese in the game. That would also mean you have more interest in driving price up.

Or, it could mean you're an institutional investor hoping to drive price down so you can scoop up the newly freed float because you caused all those other folks' stoplosses to trigger.

[–] 4 pts 3y

A call for regulation is most definitely problem-reaction-solution by the very "offenders." They must see that smaller and smaller guys are playing the game that was supposed to be theirs alone, and are looking to suggest new rules whose usurpation they've already worked out.

Fuck these Jews.

[–] 4 pts 3y

Fucking RBC, i think they had a mandatory vaccine policy too.

[–] 3 pts 3y

Can you do the same thing to them? If you cannot take the exchange to court. And put a freeze on all their business.

[–] 2 pts 3y

(((Vigorous Hand-rubbing intensifying...)))

[–] 2 pts 3y

There's been discussion of having a small fee for orders and canceling orders. Not enough to discourage the average person. But keep the high frequency bots from doing this kind of thing. Only ever discussed among gentlemen. The big guys would never allow something like that.