WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

I'm not sure where the creator pulled the market share number from. But the p/e and cap info is close enough (AMD ~160s p/e).

Anyways, I thought it was funny.

[–] 2 pts

I'll just leave this here... https://financial-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/P%2fE

Price-to-earnings ratio (P/E). The price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) is the relationship between a company's earnings and its share price, and is calculated by dividing the current price per share by the earnings per share.

A stock's P/E, also known as its multiple, gives you a sense of what you are paying for a stock in relation to its earning power.

For example, a stock with a P/E of 30 is trading at a price 30 times higher than its earnings, while one with a P/E of 15 is trading at 15 times its earnings. If earnings falter, there is usually a sell-off, which drives the price down. But if the company is successful, the share price and the P/E can climb even higher.

Similarly, a low P/E can be the sign of an undervalued company whose price hasn't caught up with its earnings potential. Conversely, a low P/E can be a clue that the market considers the company a poor investment risk.

Stocks with higher P/Es are typical of companies that are expected to grow rapidly in value. They're often more volatile than stocks with lower P/Es because it can be more difficult for the company's earnings to satisfy investor expectations.

The P/E can be calculated two ways. A trailing P/E, the figure reported in newspaper stock tables, uses earnings for the last four quarters. A forward P/E generally uses earnings for the past two quarters and an analyst's projection for the coming two.

also don't like the AMD dude CEO in a dress, makeup, and heels, creepy to me.

[–] 1 pt

lol...what? I haven't seen that!

Check the amazon one star ratings on their cpu's. I always check the percentage and the comments since if something is above 10% like hard drives then the drives are used and being touted as new or the QC has gone to crap on the drives and the 3600's had several high temperature one stars that made me rethink my strategy after reading that.

[–] [deleted] 1 pt (edited )

I'm going for Intel since if the board you buy is AMD you might need windows for a bios update whereas intel you can use a dos program and run that on a usb stick. I'm getting a Dell 10th gen intel btw for not to bad a price. Also reading the amazon cpu ratings and I think it was the 3600 was getting low rating from what is described as high running temps with the stock heater while not gaming which to me who wants to do some blender playing around with the new system is a total not buy. Besides I get a uhd built in with Intel and have to guy the g type amd to have graphics onboard so that is a big factor. Haven't heard on AMD but intels run at turbo speed at all times so the higher speed is the one linux runs at all the time. My i5 6400 a 2.7ghz quad run at 3.3 ghz all the time according to neofetch that is the cpu speed.

[–] [deleted] 1 pt (edited )

I don't think any new boards, from intel or amd, are straight bios based anymore. They're all UEFI driven and any updates can be done via flash drive while being booted into UEFI/bios.

Now running through the paces to update a huge number of linux systems on a corp network is probably a different story.

I was referring to the onboard programming bios/uefi and assumed everyone would realize that and everyone still calls it when asked accessing the bios by hitting F whatever key while booting. My bios as I refer to it as is uefi with legacy option which I never have used the legacy.

Besides that the high temps seem to be an avoided topic when discussing AMD cpu's in favor of overclocking ability and unless your using the higher quality ram then the overclocking is not as high as they say it is and sometimes just a couple hundred mb's where as my intel is 2.7 and runs at 3.3 with no overclocking on the motherboard itself and the next cpu will be much higher ghz in turbo mode no overclocking needed.

[–] 0 pt

The only caveat to the UEFI systems I have encountered are if the vendor locks in an operating system. There are still some systems I have come across that require you use windows to upgrade UEFI software, mostly laptops, ultra books, and such. Desktop boards are usually able to be upgraded directly from the UEFI interface.

[–] 1 pt

My last build was an AMD 3800x on a x570 mobo. I'm very happy with it. IMO AMD does have the upper hand for desktop gaming PCs, but INTC has some nice products out too.

Watch your youtube video's all the time so I know I can trust that opinion you are a no bullshit guy from everything I've seen so far, thanks.

[–] 0 pt

Don't know what your entire setup is like, but your CPU shouldn't be running at boost freq all the time. Unless you are doing intensive background loads while you multitask, and/or are using the integrated graphics, that speed should be >2GHz for both thermal and power savings. I've got a hot running i7 3770k 3.2GHz (boost to 4.1GHz) and it sits at 1.6GHz just browsing(no video). Then again, I have a full 16x PCIe graphics card so I'm not using the integrated.

No side on the PC case always running cool never close to overheating either. It's like having the heat set to high in a home and opening the window versus running fans with window cracked across the room.

[–] 1 pt

I wasn't saying it was overheating or getting near that. I was stating that your processor frequency, as an i5 6400 should be dynamically scaling to the the work load presented to it by the kernel. I was simply curious as to why it would be running boost at all times.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

I don't know anything about the stock market, but I do know that the PS5 and Xbox X One both run on customized x86-64 AMD platforms for both CPU and GPU purposes. So there is that going for them. Also, it would NOT be in Intel's favor if AMD were to completely fold.

[–] 1 pt

INTC does a lot more than sell computer chips. Their data center sector is going to continue to do well for them. Plus Intel puts a lot more money into R&D. We've seen these two companies jockey back and forth for the retail chip market many times over the years. INTC still has a big lead in laptops right now too, which is a hot sector atm.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

By no means do I disagree, those sectors just aren't very relevant to me so I don't have much knowledge on them so I can't comment on such. My comment was more about how AMD is still in the game. Call me nostalgic for my Athalon 2300+ and Radeon 9200 machine I guess. :)

Might just have to keep up more. Been slacking

[–] 1 pt

AMD is very much doing well. The question is if the stock has more room to grow since it is already trading at such a high P/E. With INTC trading at a low P/E, I feel it is a much better place to park some money atm.

I feel you on the nostalgia! I had an AMD 1100 Thunderbird. That was a nice machine back in the day. I actually still have the mobo and CPU in a closet somewhere.