People worried by what they call "fear mongering", are insecure people, first and foremost
There's no such thing as fear mongering, at least in my book
Either you have a brain or you don't, either you use it or you don't, and hope isn't a plan
In finance, what you have to assess, is the risk, first and foremost
ZH is all about risk, and about potential for risk, and risk usually refers to "what could possibly go wrong?"
It's the "everything that can potentially go wrong, or is going wrong", journal
It's a bad news aggregator. It saves a lot of time and tabs to open close refresh
And yes it's a sea of "bad news" in general, and most of the time it's "normal bad news".And sometimes, you have "peak bad news"
Now you can read bloomberg or usa today. Personally I have a hard time finding anything even remotely interesting in those publications. It's platitudes, and feel good news most of the time. To me it's just not interesting.
Looks like I hit a nerve here...
Oh, let's say you're not the first coming up with the same tired bs label
"it's fear mongering"
"it's a conspiracy theory"
"it's racist"
Same shit, it's nothing but labels, mostly used by MSM to disqualify a source or any piece of information
That's why I tend to use a front kick everytime I see it popping
...
Take alex jones for instance
He's a "fear mongering right wing conspiracy theorist"
But where would "we" be at, without him? Still in the MSM loop
Does it mean he's always right? No
Does it mean he's totally sane and reasonable? No
Does it mean he got everything wrong? No
The guy literally coined the word "globalist", the "offshore banking cartel"...
Now is alex jones the messiah? No
Is he the everything of all things when it comes to sources? No
Will he talk about the central role of jews? No
...
There are no perfect sources, they are all unperfect, that's why "teamwork" here is interesting, everybody comes up with his own stuffs, some it's the gateway pundit, others it's this or that
It gives a global view about topics of interest
...
Take gatestone institute, featured sometimes on zh
I rarely post any piece they write, not because they are fundamentally wrong or because I mostly disagree with their pov. They are anti islam, and what they report about it is mostly true. But they have an agenda, a neocon agenda, ie, make the goys mad at the muzzies for the benefit of kikes, essentially
So the day you see me posting a gatestone institute article featured on zh... It really has to be worth it
But I digress
Oh, let's say you're not the first coming up with the same tired bs label
"it's fear mongering"
"it's a conspiracy theory"
"it's racist"
Wow, that escalated quickly.
Calm your nipples, my friend. I never said they were spreading conspiracy theory or racist posts...
You seem really disturbed that I question why ZH recent's posts are mostly all "fear mongering".
Is there a reason? Maybe there is, considering you have been the one posting ZH links for the past 2 months more than anyone else.
(post is archived)