WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 4 pts

Their denials of what was plainly seen are further evidence of the incriminating nature of that evidence.

That mattress should be forensically tested to determine the presence of any human DNA. But it won't be, it will be "lost" or "accidentally destroyed".

The rational response to this is to draw an adverse inference from their denial. You can presume that these disgusting fuckers were committing horrific crimes.

[–] 2 pts

Literally - don't believe your lying eyes vibes.

'There very well may have been mattresses and booster chairs at this busy Religious meeting site but there is no evidence they were actually found in the tunnel, rather it is very likely they were placed there during the protests and long after the completion of any excavation work'. /lol

[–] 2 pts

Ugh, stupid retarded purposely duplicitous fact checking fake peddlers. Aside from knowingly misrepresenting 'fact'[ - (preused her other fake check work on that shit ass site) - they all use the common tactic of taking an already erroneous and conflated, incorrect social media post and then verify that yes it is indeed erroneous, conflated and incorrect. Clown world Honk honk.

[–] 1 pt

Every time I see the words "fact check" I just assume you are about to lie to me. Good job on that.