WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

Seems they got wise to the trend and now are making White people cut off their dicks completely ...

Seems they got wise to the trend and now are making White people cut off their dicks completely ...

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

That's really informative. Scope creep is a real bitch. Kikes spend all their energy hating and blaming their Lord, as well as Whites, when they should really be taking a look at their leaders.

[–] 3 pts

This is another good example of how modern Judaism started as a reactionary, anti-Christian cult. Jesus has been living rent-free in their heads ever since.

[–] 1 pt

I'm going to have to look that up but it makes more sense to me. I never understood why God would like babies to suffer having their foreskin removed. But a little nick in the skin, they can deal with it; it's way less painful than cutting the umbilical cord, which is necessary.

[–] 0 pt

This one's new to me. Any sources?

[–] 0 pt

Looked far and wide but no luck. Seems to be memory holed. Got it from a Telegram channel which didn't cite a source.

Putting the pic into Yandex image search at least yields searchable text: Two typos found in the original are marked. ("progany" and "writting")

Before around 500 BC, the original circumcision ceremony amongst the Hebrews, known as "Brit Milah", literally translating to "the covenant of the word", consists of a ritualistic nick to the penis of foreskin of an infant to draw a single drop of blood. No incisions are made, no body tissue is removed, and the glans is left unexposed. This small nick heals and no damage is left to the penis. This is the original Abrahamic covenant as he had performed on himself and his children, Isaac and Ishmael and their progany (sic!)

Around 500 BC, shortly after the destruction of the first temple in Jerusalem in 587 BC, a change was made in the Brit ceremony. In order to make a clear visual mark on the foreskin that the man is part of the covenant with God, the foreskin extending beyond the covering of the glans was cut off. This is the best part of the foreskin removed, yet the Jews kept most of their foreskin and the glans was kept covered and unexposed. Restoring the tip was easy and many Jews practiced restoration in order to obliterate their Jewish identity. Small weights were used and this is somewhat described in the Book of Maccabim. Restoring allowed the Jews to escape Judaism and enter the Roman World, avoid "head taxes" imposed on Jews, and compete in Roman sports. Jesus was circumcised as a baby this way,

In 70 AD, the second temple and Jerusalem were sacked by the Romans. It was in those days that Judaism split to Rabbinical Jews, with it's religious hierarchy, writting (sic!) down of the oral laws in the Mishna, Talmud and Halacha books, as kept in the Gola, the Jewish exile out of Israel, until their return with the rise of Zionism in the 1880's. The second group were the Christians, a jewish sect who abandoned many Jewish laws like Kosher slaughter and circumcision all together. In order to stop the process of Jews escaping Judaism by restoring their foreskins from picture B to A, a new form of circumcision was introduced by the Rabbinical order of those days. Brit Priya, and Brit Mezizah, new instructions added to the Halacha in 140 AD, 70 years after the fall of Jerusalem, instructed the Mohel, the Jewish circumciser, to now rip apart the foreskin from the glans of the baby with his nails, completely remove the foreskin and any traces of it, and suck the blood off the bleeding glans with his mouth, mixed with Holy Wine. This later on became the standard for Jews, both secular and religious, Islamic circumcision, and the vast majority of male circumcisions worldwide.