![musk making a point using a method detailed in a protocol from the learned elders of zion. [491x670 - 53KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/9OtMoA.jpg){kind=link}
The courts actually have a definition for that, though it's kind of loosey goosey...
(a) whether "the average person, applying contemporary community standards" would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest…(b) whether the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law; and (c) whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.
All 3 conditions must apply to be considered by the courts to be legally obscene.
I wish I could go back in time and fix the Ardennes Offensive.
The courts actually have a definition for that, though it's kind of loosey goosey...
(a) whether "the average person, applying contemporary community standards" would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest…(b) whether the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law; and (c) whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.
All 3 conditions must apply to be considered by the courts to be legally obscene.
I wish I could go back in time and fix the Ardennes Offensive.
(post is archived)