>Being zero on a scale of marxism isn't an accusation of being Marxist you dick. > >I said NSDAP wasn't Marxist, we shouldn't even be arguing about this but your hair splitting to pick a fight for the sake of disagreeing with someone you agree with. > >Also I said privately American elite is equal and I stand by that. The American elite are fucking children and we all know it. However bad Weimar was is exactly how bad these people are and I know how bad Weimar was I'm not saying this out of ignorance. > >As for socialism it is generally associated with redistribution or public funding. When used in any economic capacity that is what it will do, as a philosophical movement then it doesn't require that. Ism as a suffix I generally take to be the promotion of the prefix, so socialism would be promoting social health, which I doubt anyone would seeth at that but it's a pretty loose interpretation when applied to a political movement ---- >I said NSDAP wasn't Marxist... No, you said nothing of the sort. You said; >America is more Marxist than national socialist Germany ever was. Meaning that NSDAP Germany was marxist however much wasn't specified but some significant amount more than not marxist at all. The NSDAP was not marxist at all. I have no clue why you're attempting to claim you said what you didn't. It's all in quotes. >Also I said privately American elite is equal and I stand by that. You made no such qualification. This is what you said; >...America is more Marxist than national socialist Germany ever was. The us is stealing billions from Americans to gift to jews in Israel and ukraine Literal child whorehouses where you can buy children to force them to fuck animals is exactly not equal to the ~~elite~~ jews in America trucking children. I'm not sure how you can think those two completely different things are equal.