![Imagine being so retarded you think (((socialism))) [marxism] is the same as Socialism. Remember: Hitler ended the lives of jew-owned men who thought such and tried to push the jew-lie onto Germany. [1479x3142 - 7.25MB]](https://pic8.co/sh/DtahEn.png){kind=link}
Marxism was taking money from one race and giving it to another. National socialism is taking money from one race to build something important for the entire race than no individual could afford.
Nationalism is a required part of socialism, America is more Marxist than national socialist Germany ever was. The us is stealing billions from Americans to gift to jews in Israel and ukraine
National Socialism is taking...
No. Why do you believe the jew-lie that Socialism is communism and is about taking from one to give to the government. See my example ITT in reply to (((Noisy))) about how the turtles help in-need turtles. That's Social cohesion, Socialism. Socialism isn't necessarily an economic policy by any means. Additionally Socialism doesn't require (((taxes))), taxes sure but not individual (((taxes))).
...to build something important for the entire race than no individual could afford.
That's not Socialism at all. Not in part even remotely. Socialism is about protecting the whole by caring for the individual but not at the expense of any individual but of the good of the whole. It has nothing to do with building monuments or any things of import. It's in the name "Social" it's about the Social cohesion of the group, the whole.
Nationalism is a required part of socialism
Actual Socialism, yes.
America is more Marxist than national socialist Germany ever was.
That's a false comparison. NSDAP Germany was never (((marxist))). Ever. Germany was, but that was before and after NSDAP Germany, yet you specifically qualified to only NSDAP Germany. If you mean (((Wiemar))) Germany then that's just flat wrong. America may be bad but it's nowhere near as bad.
>That's a false comparison. NSDAP Germany was never (((marxist))). Ever. Germany was, but that was before and after NSDAP Germany, yet you specifically qualified to only NSDAP Germany. If you mean (((Wiemar))) Germany then that's just flat wrong. America may be bad but it's nowhere near as bad.
This shit is why you are so annoying. I never said NSDAP was Marxist, I never implied it. Also current America is almost equivalent to Weimar. In its shadows and leadership America is equal, the us is a collapse away from its full embrace.
As for taxing and redistribution being integral to socialism, I honestly thought that was an integral part of the system feel free to prove otherwise. All these isms have vague and conflicting descriptions that nobody seems to agree on which makes arguing about the ism worthless when people should simply talk about policies instead so the lies don't gum up the discussion. Otherwise you wind up arguing with someone while you both speak different languages
This shit is why you are so annoying. I never said NSDAP was Marxist, I never implied it. Also current America is almost equivalent to Weimar. In its shadows and leadership America is equal, the us is a collapse away from its full embrace.
As for taxing and redistribution being integral to socialism, I honestly thought that was an integral part of the system feel free to prove otherwise. All these isms have vague and conflicting descriptions that nobody seems to agree on which makes arguing about the ism worthless when people should simply talk about policies instead so the lies don't gum up the discussion. Otherwise you wind up arguing with someone while you both speak different languages
This shit is why you are so annoying.
Don't care, didn't ask. You just don't like it because I called out the incorrect phrasing you used;
I never said NSDAP was Marxist, I never implied it.
You did so, right here;
more Marxist than national socialist Germany ever was
"Nat Soc Germany" is NSDAP Germany. marxist Germany is (((Weimar republic))). they are disparate.
Also current America is almost equivalent to Weimar.
Not even remotely close. You need to actually read up on the sexual attrocities that were on every street in that jew-run hellhole. https://archive.md/PVODz Child sex slavery (prostitution / whoring / rape) Animal sex shows with children. etc. etc. etc. America is bad, absolutely. But it's not close.
As for taxing and redistribution being integral to socialism, I honestly thought that was an integral part of the system feel free to prove otherwise.
It's in the name. socialism, I already explained it in my previous reply. Socialism is about social health, social cohesion and unity of kin. You even stated something like this with the assertion that "Nationalism is a required part of socialism", to which I agreed.
Being zero on a scale of marxism isn't an accusation of being Marxist you dick.
I said NSDAP wasn't Marxist, we shouldn't even be arguing about this but your hair splitting to pick a fight for the sake of disagreeing with someone you agree with.
Also I said privately American elite is equal and I stand by that. The American elite are fucking children and we all know it. However bad Weimar was is exactly how bad these people are and I know how bad Weimar was I'm not saying this out of ignorance.
As for socialism it is generally associated with redistribution or public funding. When used in any economic capacity that is what it will do, as a philosophical movement then it doesn't require that. Ism as a suffix I generally take to be the promotion of the prefix, so socialism would be promoting social health, which I doubt anyone would seeth at that but it's a pretty loose interpretation when applied to a political movement
(post is archived)