Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

I am a Socialist, but what you mean by Socialism is nothing but crass (((marxism))).

crass marxism

>I am a Socialist, but what you mean by Socialism is nothing but crass (((marxism))). >>crass marxism

(post is archived)

[–] • 2 pts (edited )

There exists no form of socialism which is moral. All require slavery. All require theft from one man and redistribution to another.

(((socialism))). There is no other kind.

Anticlutch confirms his Jewishness. Bans and deletions as Jews always do when exposed. lol.

The deleted comments is anticlutch deleting comments he can't refute. So he does what Jews always do. We see you.

[–] • 1 pt

Just come out and say you think Hitler was against Whites, pro White-genocide and an advocate of judaism. Because that's required to think what you wrote. Then please go get your rhinoplasty appointment, the internet is only so big.

[+] [deleted] • 1 pt
[–] • 2 pts

That's the crap libertarian cuckservatives say with their "muh socialism is socialism" and "taxation is theft" while applying for the 100th (((government))) grant to keep their business afloat.

Taxation is theft if that money is not being used to run the country, but is being "gifted" as aid to foreign lands, while your country is crumbling.

National Socialism was the gas that was gassing kikes, not Zyklon B bug spray.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

Statist trash for insecure faggots

Please help me strong leader! Rescue me with holy government!

Same failed shit different day

[–] • 1 pt

National socialism was a resounding success. It's fucking retarded to call it a failure because jews tricked every white nation on the planet into destroying the most successful turn around in history.

Poorest nation in Europe to the richest in 4 years and a single country that stood against the entire jew controlled planet 'failure' fuck off.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

https://www.econlib.org/archives/2009/02/adolf_hitlers_e.html

Keynes himself admired the Nazi economic program, writing in the foreword to the German edition to the General Theory: “[T]he theory of output as a whole, which is what the following book purports to provide, is much more easily adapted to the conditions of a totalitarian state, than is the theory of production and distribution of a given output produced under the conditions of free competition and a large measure of laissez-faire.”

Totalitarian keynesianism wow, I want that NOW /s

Lasted 5 years

[–] • 0 pt

Failed because jews tricked every white nation into attacking it because it's economic model was a threat to their entire power base but sure link some shit take and strut around like you won

[–] • 1 pt

Marxism was taking money from one race and giving it to another. National socialism is taking money from one race to build something important for the entire race than no individual could afford.

Nationalism is a required part of socialism, America is more Marxist than national socialist Germany ever was. The us is stealing billions from Americans to gift to jews in Israel and ukraine

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Marxism was taking money from one race and giving it to another. National socialism is taking money from one race to build something important for the entire race than no individual could afford.

Nationalism is a required part of socialism, America is more Marxist than national socialist Germany ever was. The us is stealing billions from Americans to gift to jews in Israel and ukraine

National Socialism is taking...

No. Why do you believe the jew-lie that Socialism is communism and is about taking from one to give to the government. See my example ITT in reply to (((Noisy))) about how the turtles help in-need turtles. That's Social cohesion, Socialism. Socialism isn't necessarily an economic policy by any means. Additionally Socialism doesn't require (((taxes))), taxes sure but not individual (((taxes))).

...to build something important for the entire race than no individual could afford.

That's not Socialism at all. Not in part even remotely. Socialism is about protecting the whole by caring for the individual but not at the expense of any individual but of the good of the whole. It has nothing to do with building monuments or any things of import. It's in the name "Social" it's about the Social cohesion of the group, the whole.

Nationalism is a required part of socialism

Actual Socialism, yes.

America is more Marxist than national socialist Germany ever was.

That's a false comparison. NSDAP Germany was never (((marxist))). Ever. Germany was, but that was before and after NSDAP Germany, yet you specifically qualified to only NSDAP Germany. If you mean (((Wiemar))) Germany then that's just flat wrong. America may be bad but it's nowhere near as bad.

[–] • 0 pt

>That's a false comparison. NSDAP Germany was never (((marxist))). Ever. Germany was, but that was before and after NSDAP Germany, yet you specifically qualified to only NSDAP Germany. If you mean (((Wiemar))) Germany then that's just flat wrong. America may be bad but it's nowhere near as bad.

This shit is why you are so annoying. I never said NSDAP was Marxist, I never implied it. Also current America is almost equivalent to Weimar. In its shadows and leadership America is equal, the us is a collapse away from its full embrace.

As for taxing and redistribution being integral to socialism, I honestly thought that was an integral part of the system feel free to prove otherwise. All these isms have vague and conflicting descriptions that nobody seems to agree on which makes arguing about the ism worthless when people should simply talk about policies instead so the lies don't gum up the discussion. Otherwise you wind up arguing with someone while you both speak different languages

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

This shit is why you are so annoying. I never said NSDAP was Marxist, I never implied it. Also current America is almost equivalent to Weimar. In its shadows and leadership America is equal, the us is a collapse away from its full embrace.

As for taxing and redistribution being integral to socialism, I honestly thought that was an integral part of the system feel free to prove otherwise. All these isms have vague and conflicting descriptions that nobody seems to agree on which makes arguing about the ism worthless when people should simply talk about policies instead so the lies don't gum up the discussion. Otherwise you wind up arguing with someone while you both speak different languages

This shit is why you are so annoying.

Don't care, didn't ask. You just don't like it because I called out the incorrect phrasing you used;

I never said NSDAP was Marxist, I never implied it.

You did so, right here;

more Marxist than national socialist Germany ever was

"Nat Soc Germany" is NSDAP Germany. marxist Germany is (((Weimar republic))). they are disparate.

Also current America is almost equivalent to Weimar.

Not even remotely close. You need to actually read up on the sexual attrocities that were on every street in that jew-run hellhole. https://archive.md/PVODz Child sex slavery (prostitution / whoring / rape) Animal sex shows with children. etc. etc. etc. America is bad, absolutely. But it's not close.

As for taxing and redistribution being integral to socialism, I honestly thought that was an integral part of the system feel free to prove otherwise.

It's in the name. socialism, I already explained it in my previous reply. Socialism is about social health, social cohesion and unity of kin. You even stated something like this with the assertion that "Nationalism is a required part of socialism", to which I agreed.