WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

770

(post is archived)

[–] -1 pt

I disagree with this decision... I don't think the US should be feeding tax revenue to religiously-restricted charities in the first place, but if they take the free money they should deal with the implications. Otherwise we'll see taxpayer-funded jewish foster homes too. Muslim foster homes. And those might get more funding than the christian ones because they have more "oppression points".

[–] 1 pt

Otherwise we'll see taxpayer-funded jewish foster homes too.

too late, they already have those.

even Jewish "charities" that advertise without mentioning anything about how their proceeds go entirely to jews.

[–] 0 pt

another thing I have observed, Jews are often involved in banking and finance and real estate. Who do you think all those government sponsored low income charities rent their apartments from? Many jew landlords.

Poor people are being used as a middle warm body to funnel federal tax dollars straight into jew land lords and bankers hands. They do it through non profit charities too, so the charity doesn't pay taxes like another regular property managment company might have to either.

[–] 0 pt

You are already doing that

[–] 0 pt

Me? No. And if it's happening it should be stopped.

It's easy to look charitable when you're stealing the money you're giving away from other people's pockets.

[–] 0 pt

Your tax money is doing it