I honestly think the woman was inoccent. The reason they asked Jesus to throw the first stone was to accuse Him of killing a inoccent woman. If she was trully a whore, their "trap" doesnt do anything even if He throws the stone at her. Because He is literally obeying the law of the land. Plus He calls them liars and sons of the Father of lies. So its implied that He knew they were lying about the woman.
Partly correct under my interpretation.
10 When Jesus had lifted up himself, and saw none but the woman, he said unto her, Woman, where are those thine accusers? hath no man condemned thee?
11 She said, No man, Lord. And Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more.
So probably guilty but no accuser, and still forgiven.
He tells her to not sin. He always says it to everyone after He forgives them. So its probably not related to adultery, but other sins.
If He wanted to save her life, He wouldnt have let the jews stone her if they wished. The fact that He just backed down and let them do as they want, shows He knew there was no way any of them would kill a inoccent woman.
The way I see it.
(post is archived)