REEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!
But seriously, it's not the judge. To me it looks like the prosecution is intentionally aiming for a mistrial.
# REEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!
But seriously, it's not the judge. To me it looks like the prosecution is intentionally aiming for a mistrial.
To me it looks like the prosecution is intentionally aiming for a mistrial.
100%. They want a new shot with perfect information of how the Defense will argue. That's what "with prejudice" means. Cant' be retried.
>To me it looks like the prosecution is intentionally aiming for a mistrial.
100%.
They want a new shot with perfect information of how the Defense will argue.
That's what "with prejudice" means. Cant' be retried.
(post is archived)